Website report

Visit sitehttps://edits.instagram.com/

Turn your ideas into stunning videos with Edits, a new video creation app from Instagram. Edit, create & share with ease using powerful tools.

Audit Full discovery audit·Language English (en)·Response HTTP 200

Analysed Nov 9, 2026 · 15 categories · 86 passed · 33 warnings · 1 issue · 30 informational

Partial evidence; some observations were unavailable.

Audit score

F

50/100

Needs work

Agentic
83
SEO
50

What we found

1Needs a fix33Could be better86Looks good30Informational
  1. 1.Could be better: Twitter/X card: needs attention. see checkComplete link previews make your pages easier to recognize and share.
  2. 2.Could be better: Server response time: needs attention. see checkFaster pages help visitors reach your content sooner.
  3. 3.Could be better: No render-blocking head scripts: needs attention. see checkFaster pages help visitors reach your content sooner.
  4. 4.Could be better: Your site has no sitemap. see checkA sitemap helps search engines discover your pages.
  5. 5.Could be better: Interactive controls have source labels: needs attention. see checkA usable mobile layout helps visitors read and act on your content.

Site checks

86 passed · 33 warnings · 1 issues

Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.

Metadata1Could be better10Looks good

100/100
Could be better: Title lengthTitle is 61 characters, over this audit's 60-character review point (a display heuristic, not a Google limit).

Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title is 61 characters, over this audit's 60-character review point (a display heuristic, not a Google limit). Google may shorten it in results.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Front-load the distinctive topic and value so a shortened title still says what the page is. The first 57 characters read: "Edits by Instagram: Easy Video Creation & Editing | Edits…"

Looks good: Page title exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title found: "Edits by Instagram: Easy Video Creation & Editing | Edits App"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title says what the site does

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title "Edits by Instagram: Easy Video Creation & Editing | Edits Ap…" says more than the site name.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description found: "Turn your ideas into stunning videos with Edits, a new video creation app from Instagram. …"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Description is 142 characters and inside this audit's 70–160 preview range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Titles unique across pages

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 10 indexable sampled pages have distinct titles.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Character encoding declared

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

UTF-8 declared in the Content-Type header and a meta tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTML5 doctype

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HTML5 doctype declared.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta keywords tag

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No obsolete meta keywords tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Indexing1Could be better12Looks good3Informational

80/100
Could be better: Sitemap existsNo sitemap found (checked https://edits.instagram.com/sitemap/edits_instagram_com_sitemap.xml.gz → 403).

Could be better · Indexing · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No sitemap found (checked https://edits.instagram.com/sitemap/edits_instagram_com_sitemap.xml.gz → 403).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a sitemap.xml and submit it in Google Search Console. Next.js: export from app/sitemap.ts — it's ~10 lines.

Reference
Not applicable: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signalsNo sitemap was found, so there are no submitted URLs to compare against.

Not applicable · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No sitemap was found, so there are no submitted URLs to compare against.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

The sitemap check covers the missing file. Once one exists, this check confirms the URLs it lists are indexable.

Not measured: Sitemap parses and lists URLsNo sitemap was reachable, so its contents cannot be validated.

Not measured · Indexing · Not established

Observed evidence

No sitemap was reachable, so its contents cannot be validated.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish /sitemap.xml with your canonical URLs. This check then validates the XML and the URLs it lists.

Not applicable: Sitemap declared in robots.txtNo sitemap was reachable, so robots.txt has nothing to point at.

Not applicable · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No sitemap was reachable, so robots.txt has nothing to point at.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Publish the sitemap first, then add a Sitemap: line to robots.txt naming its absolute URL.

Looks good: Single canonical declaration

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

One canonical declaration found.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 10 more checks
Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No meta-refresh redirect.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No soft-404 response

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical target integrity

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt responds with 200.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. No path rule matches this URL.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical URL set

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical set: https://edits.instagram.com/

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is absolute and points at this page.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: www vs apex consistency

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Hostname is used consistently (edits.instagram.com).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: URLs are readable slugs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

URL slugs are readable (9 sampled).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No restrictive search-access signal on 10 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Content1Could be better9Looks good1Informational

100/100
Could be better: Text-to-HTML ratioVisible text is 4.6% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Visible text is 4.6% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Text-to-HTML ratio is not a ranking factor, but a very low value often means deeply nested markup or content that only appears after JavaScript runs. Check the source-content checks before changing anything.

Not measured: ReadabilityFlesch reading ease ≈ 52.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Flesch reading ease ≈ 52.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

60+ reads easily for most visitors. This is a heuristic, not a rule — technical audiences tolerate denser text.

Looks good: Crawlable content in source HTML

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No recognized empty JavaScript application shell on 10 sampled page(s). The entered page exposes 262 publisher word(s).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Homepage content volume

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited page has about 262 words of main content.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No placeholder text

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No starter-template leftovers

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No starter-template artifacts detected.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Title and H1 agree

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title and H1 share topic words: video, editing, app.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicates

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No near-duplicate main content among 10 indexable sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No deprecated HTML tags

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No deprecated HTML tags.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Outbound references

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

9 outbound link(s) present.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pages

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No repeated description, H1, or publisher copy across 10 sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Social sharing2Could be better6Looks good

72/100
Could be better: Twitter/X cardNo twitter:card tag.

Could be better · Social sharing · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No twitter:card tag.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">. X falls back to Open Graph for the rest, but the card type itself must be declared.

Reference
Could be better: Share image dimensions declaredog:image:width / og:image:height are missing.

Could be better · Social sharing · Review suggested

Observed evidence

og:image:width / og:image:height are missing.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Declare them (1200×630 recommended) so platforms render the preview immediately on first share instead of after re-scraping.

Looks good: Open Graph title

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:title: "Edits by Instagram: Easy Video Creation & Editing | Edits App"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph description

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:description: "Turn your ideas into stunning videos with Edits, a new video creation app from Instagram. …"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph image

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image is set: "https://www.facebook.com/business/f/4131149643878882/"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image loads

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image returns 200 (image/jpeg).

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:url and og:type

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:url and og:type ("website") are set.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:site_name

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:site_name: "Edits App".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Structured dataNot measured

Not measured
Could be better: JSON-LD presentNo JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.

Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add Organization and WebSite schema. They state who publishes the site and what it is called, which is what rich results and answer engines read first.

Reference
Could be better: Organization or WebSite schemaNo Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.

Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an identity node so search engines and AI assistants can attribute your content to a real entity.

Reference
Not applicable: JSON-LD parsesNo JSON-LD blocks were found, so there is no syntax to validate.

Not applicable · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No JSON-LD blocks were found, so there is no syntax to validate.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Add a <script type="application/ld+json"> block describing the page — Organization or WebSite is the usual starting point.

Not measured: Breadcrumb schema on inner pagesNone of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Not measured · Structured data · Not established

Observed evidence

None of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add BreadcrumbList to inner pages — Google shows breadcrumbs in results and it clarifies site structure.

Affected pages (9)

  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/captions/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/desktop/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/blog/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/keyframes/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/teleprompter/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/restyle/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/ideas/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/effects/
Reference
Not applicable: Content-specific schemaNo content-specific schema (Article, Product, FAQPage…) detected.

Not applicable · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No content-specific schema (Article, Product, FAQPage…) detected.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

If you publish articles, products or FAQs, add the matching schema type — that's what makes rich results (stars, FAQs, prices) possible.

Reference

Headings2Could be better5Looks good

83/100
Could be better: Heading levels don't skip4 heading level skips: H2 → H5 "SIMPLIFY YOUR PROCESS"; H3 → H5 "CREATE WITH POWERFUL TOOLS"; H3 → H5 "INFORM YOUR CREATIVE DECISIONS"; ….

Could be better · Headings · Review suggested

Observed evidence

4 heading level skips: H2 → H5 "SIMPLIFY YOUR PROCESS"; H3 → H5 "CREATE WITH POWERFUL TOOLS"; H3 → H5 "INFORM YOUR CREATIVE DECISIONS"; ….

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Use the next level down for each subsection (H2 under H1, H3 under H2). If a heading level was chosen for its font size, keep the level and change the styling instead.

Could be better: Element IDs are unique per document3 duplicate ID occurrence(s) across 1 document(s).

Could be better · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

3 duplicate ID occurrence(s) across 1 document(s).

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Give each element a unique id and update fragment links and aria-labelledby references to point to the intended element.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://edits.instagram.com/desktop/
Looks good: H1 exists

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 found: "Video editing app for creators"

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Single H1

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Exactly one H1 on the homepage.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: H1 has real text

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 reads "Video editing app for creators".

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Headings are descriptive

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

15 headings, averaging 5.8 words — descriptive.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is sectioned with H2s

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

5 H2 section(s) structure the page.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Images2Could be better2Looks good

69/100
Could be better: Width/height attributes3 of 11 visible images lack width and height attributes: media, media, -PAXP-deijE.gif.

Could be better · Images · Review suggested

Observed evidence

3 of 11 visible images lack width and height attributes: media, media, -PAXP-deijE.gif.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Set explicit width and height so the browser reserves the space before the image loads. Without them the page shifts as images arrive, which is what Cumulative Layout Shift measures. next/image sets them for you.

Reference
Could be better: Lazy loadingNone of the 11 visible images are lazy-loaded (no loading="lazy" and no lazy-loading library markers).

Could be better · Images · Review suggested

Observed evidence

None of the 11 visible images are lazy-loaded (no loading="lazy" and no lazy-loading library markers).

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add loading="lazy" to below-the-fold images so the initial render doesn't wait on them. Keep the hero image eager.

Reference
Looks good: Alt text coverage

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 11 visible images declare alt attributes (including empty alt for decorative images). Whether each description fits its image needs a human look.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Modern image formats

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

2 of 2 raster images have a WebP/AVIF source or come from a format-negotiating image service.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Mobile1Could be better3Looks good2Informational

76/100
Could be better: Interactive controls have source labels160 of 456 source controls lack a detectable name.

Could be better · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

160 of 456 source controls lack a detectable name.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Give each control visible text, a connected label, aria-label or aria-labelledby. Placeholder and neighboring text alone do not name an input. Verify the browser accessibility tree after fixing.

Affected pages (10)

  • https://edits.instagram.com/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/captions/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/desktop/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/blog/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/keyframes/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/teleprompter/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/restyle/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/ideas/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/effects/
Reference
Not applicable: Responsive image markupNone of the 18 images use srcset.

Not applicable · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

None of the 18 images use srcset.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Serve smaller variants to phones with srcset/sizes (next/image handles this) — mobile users shouldn't download desktop-sized images.

Not measured: No tiny inline font sizesNo sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Not measured · Mobile · Not established

Observed evidence

No sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Check computed font sizes in a browser across mobile widths.

Looks good: Viewport meta tag

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Viewport configured: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1".

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The viewport lets users zoom.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: ARIA references point to source elements

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

20 ARIA reference(s) resolve within their source documents. Rendered visibility was not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Language1Could be better2Looks good

81/100
Could be better: hreflang syntaxhreflang "es-la" uses "la", which is not an ISO 3166-1 country code.

Could be better · Language · Review suggested

Observed evidence

hreflang "es-la" uses "la", which is not an ISO 3166-1 country code.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Use a specific country code instead (for the United Kingdom: en-GB). Google ignores hreflang values with unknown regions.

Reference
Looks good: html lang attribute

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language declared: lang="en".

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Declared language matches content

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Declared language (en) matches detected content language.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Branding1Looks good3Informational

100/100
Not measured: Apple touch iconNo apple-touch-icon link.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No apple-touch-icon link.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add a 180×180 apple-touch-icon so iOS home-screen bookmarks show your logo instead of a screenshot.

Not measured: Web app manifestNo web manifest linked.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No web manifest linked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional, but a manifest.json enables install prompts and better mobile integration.

Not measured: Theme colorNo theme-color meta tag.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No theme-color meta tag.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add <meta name="theme-color"> to tint the mobile browser UI to your brand color. Small touch, feels polished.

Looks good: Favicon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/yb/r/GUfGNlBjVjq.svg).

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Performance

47/100

Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.

Performance measurements observed during the audit
MeasureThis siteReading
Server response time1338 msCould be better: needs attentionThe audit received response headers after 1338 ms from one test location.
No render-blocking head scripts367 SCould be better: needs attention1 synchronous script(s) in <head> block rendering: https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v4/yi/r/5C9Zj_x367S.js.
HTML payload size493 KBCould be better: needs attentionThe page's HTML is 493 KB uncompressed.
Web fonts don't block text—Informational: not applicableNo Google Fonts stylesheet links detected.
Inline styles are bounded15.6 KBLooks good: goodInline styles total 15.6 KB.
Script/stylesheet count—Looks good: good20 total script/style resources — reasonable.
HTML served compressed—Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br.
Iframe usage—Looks good: goodNo iframes.
Source HTML weight493.4 KBInformational: measured source, not transferred bytes493.4 KB of HTML on the audited page

From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.

Security

100/100

HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.

Could be better: Content Security PolicyA CSP is present but its script or object restrictions need review.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

A CSP is present but its script or object restrictions need review.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Restrict script origins, use nonces or hashes for inline scripts, avoid unsafe evaluation, and set object-src 'none'.

Could be better: Referrer policyReferrer-Policy is "default", which sends full page URLs (including paths and query strings) to other sites.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Referrer-Policy is "default", which sends full page URLs (including paths and query strings) to other sites.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Use strict-origin-when-cross-origin unless a partner integration genuinely needs full URLs.

Not applicable: Declared form submission targetsNo HTML forms were found.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No HTML forms were found.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Check JavaScript-generated form transport separately if present.

Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Review authentication forms separately when applicable.

Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Site serves over HTTPS.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTTP redirects to HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

http:// permanently redirects to https://./

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HSTS header

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HSTS is set: max-age=31536000; preload; includeSubDomains.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Frame embedding protection

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Response headers restrict cross-origin framing (X-Frame-Options DENY).

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Browser feature permissions

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

A Permissions-Policy disables at least one sensitive browser feature.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Review remaining features and allow only origins the application needs.

Looks good: X-Content-Type-Options

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

nosniff is set.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No mixed content

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No insecure subresources detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Server technology disclosure

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No X-Powered-By disclosure.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AI answer readiness

100/100

Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.

Could be better: llms.txtNo /llms.txt file.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No /llms.txt file.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Optional: publish an llms.txt index of useful pages. This proposal is not a requirement for Google AI features, and its absence does not reduce the core score.

Reference
Could be better: FAQ/QA schemaNo FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

If the page answers recurring questions, use visible question-and-answer content and matching FAQPage markup. QAPage is for a single question with user-submitted answers. Google FAQ rich results are restricted to eligible authoritative government and health sites; markup does not guarantee AI citations.

Reference
Could be better: Question-style headingsOnly 9% of 44 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 9% of 44 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Phrase key subheadings as the questions users actually ask ("How much does X cost?"). This improves the measured question-heading signal; the audit does not guarantee citations.

Could be better: Freshness signalsNo dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

For content where dates matter, show the actual update date and mirror it in dateModified. Do not invent dates or change them without a substantive update. Missing dates alone do not prove stale content.

Could be better: Question headings have concise answers0/4 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

0/4 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Put a direct 20–500 character answer paragraph immediately after each question heading so retrieval systems can quote it cleanly.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://edits.instagram.com/blog/
Could be better: Machine-readable provenance signalsOnly 1 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Only 1 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add the missing author, date, breadcrumb, or contact signal so machines can identify provenance and site structure.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://edits.instagram.com/
Could be better: Markdown copies of pagesNo markdown copy answered at /index.md or /tutorials/captions/index.md or /index.html.md.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No markdown copy answered at /index.md or /tutorials/captions/index.md or /index.html.md.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a clean markdown copy of each key page at /page.md (or /page.html.md). It strips navigation and scripts, so a retriever spends its budget on your content.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://edits.instagram.com/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/captions/
Reference
Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No /llms-full.txt.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.

Reference
Not measured: Authored, dated articlesNo Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add Article schema with author and datePublished so the page exposes clear provenance for retrieval. This audit does not measure or guarantee citations or rankings.

Not measured: Citable facts densityVery few concrete figures in the text (0 numbers in 293 words).

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

Very few concrete figures in the text (0 numbers in 293 words).

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Specific numbers, dates and stats are what AI answers cite. 'Fast' is ignorable; '2.3× faster' is quotable.

Not measured: llms.txt follows the specNo readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish llms.txt first — the llms.txt check covers that — then this one verifies the structure.

Reference
Not applicable: Accept: text/markdown negotiationThe homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset="utf-8".

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset="utf-8".

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Optional: return a stripped markdown body when the request asks for text/markdown. Some hosts and CDNs do this for you; a plain HTML answer is not a defect.

Not applicable: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectableNo OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

An API is optional. Add a service-desc link if you already publish a machine-readable API specification.

Looks good: AI crawler access

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Semantic HTML structure

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Semantic structure present: main×1, section×8.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Answers lead the section

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs get to the point without preamble.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is chunkable

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs average 24 words — chunk-friendly.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Definitional opening

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Opening paragraph reads as a definition.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Cites external sources

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

40 outbound reference(s) across crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Consistent brand entity

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Brand declared: og:site_name "Edits App".

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Description reads as a liftable summary

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description works as a standalone summary.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Entity identity agrees across signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The site is consistently named "Edits App" and 2 identity URL(s) stay on edits.instagram.com.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AdSense readinessOptional

31/100

Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.

On its own, this site scores 39/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.

Needs a fix: Privacy policy pageNo privacy policy page is linked or crawlable.

Needs a fix · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

No privacy policy page is linked or crawlable.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Publish an accessible privacy policy that discloses cookies and data use by Google and other third-party ad vendors.

Reference
Could be better: Terms pageNo terms of use page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No terms of use page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Consider adding terms that identify the service rules and publisher. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense requirement.

Could be better: Contact methodNo contact page or mailto link found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No contact page or mailto link found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add a working contact route or visible email so users can reach the publisher. This is a trust heuristic, not a published approval rule.

Could be better: Clear navigationOnly 0 link(s) inside <nav>/<header> and 2 recognizable primary navigation destination(s).

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 0 link(s) inside <nav>/<header> and 2 recognizable primary navigation destination(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add crawlable navigation that lets users reach the site's main publisher content and policy pages.

Reference
Could be better: Author bylines on content1/1 sampled editorial pages lack detectable author attribution.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/1 sampled editorial pages lack detectable author attribution.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Identify who created editorial content with a visible byline, author link, or matching Article author markup. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense approval rule.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://edits.instagram.com/blog/
Reference
Not measured: Privacy policy advertising disclosuresA privacy page was not present in the crawl sample, so its disclosures could not be verified.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

A privacy page was not present in the crawl sample, so its disclosures could not be verified.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Confirm the policy explains cookies or similar storage, Google or advertising vendors, and third-party data use.

Reference
Not measured: First-party contact emailNo public contact email was found in the sampled home, About, or Contact pages.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No public contact email was found in the sampled home, About, or Contact pages.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

A public email is optional. The separate contact-method check covers whether readers have a way to reach the publisher.

Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No ads.txt yet.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.

Reference
Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.

Reference
Not measured: Author or publisher backgroundNo attributed editorial page was available for an author-background check.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No attributed editorial page was available for an author-background check.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add attribution first; the separate author check lists affected pages.

Not measured: Latest article has real depthNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reads the newest one.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article reads as edited workNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reviews its style signals.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article names an author and a dateNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then looks for its byline and date.

Reference
Looks good: About page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

About page found: /#about

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled publisher-content coverage

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

All 10 editorial pages expose at least 250 publisher words; those pages hold 3125 publisher words in total.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Thin page share

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

10/10 editorial pages clear the audit's publisher-content triage threshold.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No ads on non-content screens

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Looks good: Tool pages expose explanatory content

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

All 1 sampled tool-style screens include crawlable explanation.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No high publisher-content repetition among 9 substantial sampled page(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content exists in source HTML

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No empty client-rendered publisher shell in the crawl sample.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 4 more checks
Looks good: Article-style content exists

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Article-style content detected.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No "coming soon", "under construction" or lorem-ipsum text on crawled pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language "en" is AdSense-supported.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Existing ad scripts

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No competing ad scripts on the page.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Hosting and infrastructure

Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.

Hosting and infrastructure observations
Hostnameedits.instagram.com
IP addresses57.144.216.192, 2a03:2880:f381:c0:face:b00c:0:43fe
DNS A57.144.216.192
DNS AAAA2a03:2880:f381:c0:face:b00c:0:43fe
DNS CNAMEinstagram.c10r.instagram.com
TLSTLSv1.3TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
Certificate issuerDigiCert Inc / DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Certificate valid untilNov 16 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Certificate validationPassed

Website anatomy and diagnostics

Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.

Page architecture

Choose a page to explore its details and connections.

Page content

262 publisher words

Page structure

html content

Observed discovery

Depth 0 · 9 incoming links

HTTP 200 · 493.4 KB source

Source interactions

49 controls · 16 unnamed

1 script / 19 stylesheet references

Canonical declaration
https://edits.instagram.com/
Schema types
None observed
Outgoing links in sampled graph
/tutorials/captions/ · /tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/ · /tutorials/keyframes/ · /tutorials/teleprompter/ · /tutorials/restyle/ · /tutorials/ideas/ · /tutorials/effects/ · /tutorials/creative-copilot/ · /tutorials/enhanced-camera/ · /tutorials/storyboards/ · /tutorials/cinematic-filters-crop/ · /tutorials/template/ · /tutorials/caption-generator/ · /tutorials/text-styling/ · /desktop/ · /blog/

Routes: / · /tutorials · /desktop · /blog

Resource origins 4

Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.

  • https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/stylesheet, script, image · 257 references · cross origin
  • https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/image · 107 references · cross origin
  • https://scontent-sea5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/image · 14 references · cross origin
  • https://scontent-sea5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/image · 1 references · cross origin
Crawler policy by page

Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.

Robots policy for every evaluated crawler and sampled page
Crawler / purposePagePolicyMatched directive
Googlebotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Googlebotsearch/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/tutorials/captions/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/desktop/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/tutorials/keyframes/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/tutorials/teleprompter/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/tutorials/restyle/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/tutorials/ideas/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/tutorials/effects/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces

No supported machine interfaces were advertised in the sampled HTML. An API or MCP server is optional; undiscovered interfaces remain unknown.

Public DNS and TLS endpoint

edits.instagram.com · observed · 57.144.216.192, 2a03:2880:f381:c0:face:b00c:0:43fe

A
57.144.216.192
AAAA
2a03:2880:f381:c0:face:b00c:0:43fe
CNAME
instagram.c10r.instagram.com
NS
Unavailable for this exact hostname
MX
Unavailable for this exact hostname
CAA
Unavailable for this exact hostname

TLS: TLSv1.3

Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.

Issuer: DigiCert Inc / DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1

Certificate valid until: Nov 16 23:59:59 2026 GMT

PageSpeed measurement

Loading the PageSpeed panel…

Growth resources

Loading growth resources…

Where to take this site next

Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.

  1. 01

    Fix the fundamentals first

    Your top fixes list is the priority order — clear the red items before creating more content.

  2. 02

    Re-run the combined audit after each batch of fixes

    Re-run after fixes to see which checks changed; score bands are guidance, not a guarantee of ranking, traffic, or approval.

  3. 03

    Fix AdSense policy signals

    Make policy pages, publisher disclosures and substantial content reachable before applying. This audit cannot predict approval.

Apply the recommended fixes

Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.

Open in ChatGPT Open in Grok Open in Perplexity

Report notes

  • 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
  • 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
  • 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
  • https://edits.instagram.com/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/captions/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/desktop/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/blog/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/advanced-audio-editing-tools/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/keyframes/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/teleprompter/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/restyle/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/ideas/
  • https://edits.instagram.com/tutorials/effects/