Website report

Visit sitehttps://www.file.ai/

fileAI transforms unstructured enterprise data into trusted records and governed AI workflows for finance, insurance, banking, healthcare, and more.

Audit Full discovery audit·Language English (en)·Response HTTP 200

Analysed Nov 7, 2026 · 15 categories · 99 passed · 30 warnings · 1 issue · 20 informational

Audit score

D

68/100

Mixed

Agentic
74
SEO
74

What we found

1Needs a fix30Could be better99Looks good20Informational
  1. 1.Could be better: Semantic HTML structure: needs attention. see checkClear, accessible information helps AI assistants understand and cite your website.
  2. 2.Could be better: Interactive controls have source labels: needs attention. see checkA usable mobile layout helps visitors read and act on your content.
  3. 3.Could be better: Share image dimensions declared: needs attention. see checkComplete link previews make your pages easier to recognize and share.
  4. 4.Could be better: Images are missing size information. see checkDeclared dimensions keep content from jumping while images load.
  5. 5.Could be better: Your images use older file formats. see checkEfficient image formats reduce download size.

Built with 1 technology· detected stack

Read from the public source and response headers of the sampled pages.

Content managementType
  • FramerCMS / platform

A framework or CDN signal describes the public response, not the origin host or private backend.

Site checks

99 passed · 30 warnings · 1 issues

Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.

Metadata1Could be better10Looks good

100/100
Could be better: Title lengthTitle is 62 characters, over this audit's 60-character review point (a display heuristic, not a Google limit).

Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title is 62 characters, over this audit's 60-character review point (a display heuristic, not a Google limit). Google may shorten it in results.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Front-load the distinctive topic and value so a shortened title still says what the page is. The first 57 characters read: "Enterprise AI Workflow Automation & Data Intelligence | f…"

Looks good: Page title exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title found: "Enterprise AI Workflow Automation & Data Intelligence | fileAI"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title says what the site does

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title "Enterprise AI Workflow Automation & Data Intelligence | file…" says more than the site name.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description found: "fileAI transforms unstructured enterprise data into trusted records and governed AI workfl…"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Description is 148 characters and inside this audit's 70–160 preview range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Titles unique across pages

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 10 indexable sampled pages have distinct titles.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Character encoding declared

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

UTF-8 declared in a meta tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTML5 doctype

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HTML5 doctype declared.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta keywords tag

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No obsolete meta keywords tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Indexing16Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Single canonical declaration

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

One canonical declaration found.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No meta-refresh redirect.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No soft-404 response

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical target integrity

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Indexability signals align across 10 sampled URL(s).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 10 more checks
Looks good: robots.txt exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt responds with 200.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. Most specific matching path; allow wins equal-length conflicts.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap found at https://www.file.ai/sitemap.xml.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap parses and lists URLs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap lists 162 same-origin URLs.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap declared in robots.txt

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt declares the sitemap.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical URL set

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical set: https://www.file.ai/

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is absolute and points at this page.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: www vs apex consistency

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Hostname is used consistently (www.file.ai).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: URLs are readable slugs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

URL slugs are readable (23 sampled).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No restrictive search-access signal on 10 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Content2Could be better8Looks good1Informational

100/100
Could be better: Text-to-HTML ratioVisible text is 3.0% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Visible text is 3.0% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Text-to-HTML ratio is not a ranking factor, but a very low value often means deeply nested markup or content that only appears after JavaScript runs. Check the source-content checks before changing anything.

Could be better: Title and H1 agreeTitle ("Enterprise AI Workflow Automation & Data Intellige…") and H1 ("@keyframes fai-hero-in{from{opacity:0;transform:tr…") share no significant words.

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title ("Enterprise AI Workflow Automation & Data Intellige…") and H1 ("@keyframes fai-hero-in{from{opacity:0;transform:tr…") share no significant words.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Align them around the same core topic — mixed signals confuse both rankers and readers.

Not measured: ReadabilityFlesch reading ease ≈ 5 — very difficult.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Flesch reading ease ≈ 5 — very difficult.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Shorten sentences and prefer plain words. Aim for 50–70 for a general audience.

Looks good: Crawlable content in source HTML

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No recognized empty JavaScript application shell on 10 sampled page(s). The entered page exposes 1086 publisher word(s).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Homepage content volume

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited page has about 1086 words of main content.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No placeholder text

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: No starter-template leftovers

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No starter-template artifacts detected.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicates

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No near-duplicate main content among 10 indexable sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No deprecated HTML tags

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No deprecated HTML tags.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Outbound references

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

29 outbound link(s) present.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pages

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No repeated description, H1, or publisher copy across 10 sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Social sharing1Could be better6Looks good1Informational

92/100
Could be better: Share image dimensions declaredog:image:width / og:image:height are missing.

Could be better · Social sharing · Review suggested

Observed evidence

og:image:width / og:image:height are missing.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Declare them (1200×630 recommended) so platforms render the preview immediately on first share instead of after re-scraping.

Not measured: og:site_nameNo og:site_name tag.

Not measured · Social sharing · Not established

Observed evidence

No og:site_name tag.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add it. Share cards use it to label the publisher; consistent naming also gives this audit a measurable entity signal. It does not measure or guarantee citations, rankings, or traffic.

Reference
Looks good: Open Graph title

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:title: "Enterprise AI Workflow Automation & Data Intelligence | fileAI"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph description

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:description: "fileAI transforms unstructured enterprise data into trusted records and governed AI workfl…"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph image

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image is set: "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/GNYwMdGN8zXxBvlGlqI7437tY.png"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image loads

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image returns 200 (image/png).

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:url and og:type

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:url and og:type ("website") are set.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Twitter/X card

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

twitter:card is "summary_large_image".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Structured data2Could be better2Looks good1Informational

100/100
Could be better: JSON-LD presentNo JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.

Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add Organization and WebSite schema. They state who publishes the site and what it is called, which is what rich results and answer engines read first.

Reference
Could be better: Organization or WebSite schemaNo Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.

Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an identity node so search engines and AI assistants can attribute your content to a real entity.

Reference
Not measured: Breadcrumb schema on inner pagesNone of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Not measured · Structured data · Not established

Observed evidence

None of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add BreadcrumbList to inner pages — Google shows breadcrumbs in results and it clarifies site structure.

Affected pages (9)

  • https://www.file.ai/about
  • https://www.file.ai/legal/privacy-policy
  • https://www.file.ai/customers
  • https://www.file.ai/pricing
  • https://www.file.ai/platform/fileforge
  • https://www.file.ai/fileforensics
  • https://www.file.ai/solutions/insurance
  • https://www.file.ai/blog
  • https://www.file.ai/industry-expertise
Reference
Looks good: JSON-LD parses

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 1 JSON-LD block(s) parse cleanly.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content-specific schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Content schema found: FAQPage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Headings2Could be better5Looks good

91/100
Could be better: Element IDs are unique per document11 duplicate ID occurrence(s) across 2 document(s).

Could be better · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

11 duplicate ID occurrence(s) across 2 document(s).

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Give each element a unique id and update fragment links and aria-labelledby references to point to the intended element.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://www.file.ai/
  • https://www.file.ai/solutions/insurance
Could be better: Single H1The homepage has 3 <h1> elements.

Could be better · Headings · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The homepage has 3 <h1> elements.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Review whether one main heading and subordinate H2 sections would make the outline clearer. Multiple H1s alone do not establish a search-ranking problem.

Looks good: H1 exists

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 found: "@keyframes fai-hero-in{from{opacity:0;transform:translateY(12px)}to{opacity:1;transform:no…"

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Heading levels don't skip

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Heading hierarchy is sequential across 42 headings.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: H1 has real text

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 reads "@keyframes fai-hero-in{from{opacity:0;transform:translateY(12px)}to{op…".

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Headings are descriptive

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

42 headings, averaging 5.0 words — descriptive.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is sectioned with H2s

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

17 H2 section(s) structure the page.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Images2Could be better2Looks good

69/100
Could be better: Width/height attributes12 of 150 visible images lack width and height attributes: hL6iBjYHLEqovA3fXh4Lk5BeE8.jpg, zEc7rRFU7Ixshx0XsGGPfoOtk.svg, hL6iBjYHLEqovA3fXh4Lk5BeE8.jpg, ….

Could be better · Images · Review suggested

Observed evidence

12 of 150 visible images lack width and height attributes: hL6iBjYHLEqovA3fXh4Lk5BeE8.jpg, zEc7rRFU7Ixshx0XsGGPfoOtk.svg, hL6iBjYHLEqovA3fXh4Lk5BeE8.jpg, ….

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Set explicit width and height so the browser reserves the space before the image loads. Without them the page shifts as images arrive, which is what Cumulative Layout Shift measures. next/image sets them for you.

Reference
Could be better: Modern image formats112 of 112 raster images are served only as PNG or JPEG: yCQ4OsAsfOcmBgwMScyAT1oERs.jpg, 60WhCkSqW6mxw2sLMVxMUTcb0.png, IkbhAWHKWP345op3bfkuxhgYwcY.png, ….

Could be better · Images · Review suggested

Observed evidence

112 of 112 raster images are served only as PNG or JPEG: yCQ4OsAsfOcmBgwMScyAT1oERs.jpg, 60WhCkSqW6mxw2sLMVxMUTcb0.png, IkbhAWHKWP345op3bfkuxhgYwcY.png, ….

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Serve WebP or AVIF versions, which are usually 25–50% smaller at the same quality. Use <picture> with a WebP/AVIF <source> and the original as fallback, or an image CDN or framework image component that converts automatically.

Reference
Looks good: Alt text coverage

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 150 visible images declare alt attributes (including empty alt for decorative images). Whether each description fits its image needs a human look.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Lazy loading

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

74/150 images are lazy-loaded.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Mobile1Could be better4Looks good1Informational

77/100
Could be better: Interactive controls have source labels19 of 1050 source controls lack a detectable name.

Could be better · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

19 of 1050 source controls lack a detectable name.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Give each control visible text, a connected label, aria-label or aria-labelledby. Placeholder and neighboring text alone do not name an input. Verify the browser accessibility tree after fixing.

Affected pages (5)

  • https://www.file.ai/customers
  • https://www.file.ai/pricing
  • https://www.file.ai/platform/fileforge
  • https://www.file.ai/fileforensics
  • https://www.file.ai/solutions/insurance
Reference
Not measured: No tiny inline font sizes3 element(s) with text set an inline font size below 12px.

Not measured · Mobile · Not established

Observed evidence

3 element(s) with text set an inline font size below 12px.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Text under 12px is hard to read on phones and flagged by Lighthouse. Bump it up or make it decorative-only.

Looks good: Viewport meta tag

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Viewport configured: "width=device-width".

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The viewport lets users zoom.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Responsive image markup

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

37/156 images ship responsive srcset variants.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: ARIA references point to source elements

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

29 ARIA reference(s) resolve within their source documents. Rendered visibility was not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Language3Looks good

100/100
Looks good: html lang attribute

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language declared: lang="en".

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: hreflang syntax

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

3 syntactically valid hreflang tags including x-default. Reciprocal links and target content were not verified.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Declared language matches content

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Declared language (en) matches detected content language.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Branding1Looks good3Informational

100/100
Not measured: Apple touch iconNo apple-touch-icon link.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No apple-touch-icon link.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add a 180×180 apple-touch-icon so iOS home-screen bookmarks show your logo instead of a screenshot.

Not measured: Web app manifestNo web manifest linked.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No web manifest linked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional, but a manifest.json enables install prompts and better mobile integration.

Not measured: Theme colorNo theme-color meta tag.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No theme-color meta tag.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add <meta name="theme-color"> to tint the mobile browser UI to your brand color. Small touch, feels polished.

Looks good: Favicon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (https://framerusercontent.com/images/FGEpPBAeOeij9XJIspyXnTAFY.png).

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Performance

83/100

Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.

Performance measurements observed during the audit
MeasureThis siteReading
HTML payload size539 KBCould be better: needs attentionThe page's HTML is 539 KB uncompressed.
Inline styles are bounded174 KBCould be better: needs attention174 KB of inline <style> in the page.
Web fonts don't block text—Informational: not applicableNo Google Fonts stylesheet links detected.
Server response time448 msLooks good: goodThe audit received response headers after 448 ms from one test location.
No render-blocking head scripts—Looks good: goodNo synchronous render-blocking scripts in <head>.
Script/stylesheet count—Looks good: good3 total script/style resources — reasonable.
HTML served compressed—Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br.
Iframe usage—Looks good: goodNo iframes.
Source HTML weight539.1 KBInformational: measured source, not transferred bytes539.1 KB of HTML on the audited page

From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.

Security

94/100

HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.

Could be better: Frame embedding protectionNo frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Send Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' (or 'none', or a list of partner origins), or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN. It stops other sites from framing your pages to trick visitors into clicking (clickjacking).

Reference
Could be better: Content Security PolicyNo Content-Security-Policy detected.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Content-Security-Policy detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Configure an enforced policy for script and resource origins; use report-only monitoring to prepare changes safely.

Reference
Could be better: Browser feature permissionsNo explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Disable unused camera, microphone, or geolocation access using Permissions-Policy.

Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Review authentication forms separately when applicable.

Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Site serves over HTTPS.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTTP redirects to HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

http:// permanently redirects to https://./

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HSTS header

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HSTS is set: max-age=31536000.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Referrer policy

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No Referrer-Policy is set, so browsers apply their default, strict-origin-when-cross-origin, which sends only the origin to other sites.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: X-Content-Type-Options

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

nosniff is set.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No mixed content

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No insecure subresources detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Server technology disclosure

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No X-Powered-By disclosure.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Declared form submission targets

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

11 declared form(s) submit over HTTPS to this site. Runtime submission behavior is untested.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AI answer readiness

55/100

Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.

Could be better: Semantic HTML structureSemantic landmarks exist (21) but there's no <main> or role="main".

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Semantic landmarks exist (21) but there's no <main> or role="main".

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Wrap the primary content in one <main>. Readers, screen readers and content extractors use it to find the substance and skip the navigation and footer.

Could be better: llms.txtNo /llms.txt file.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No /llms.txt file.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Optional: publish an llms.txt index of useful pages. This proposal is not a requirement for Google AI features, and its absence does not reduce the core score.

Reference
Could be better: Question-style headingsOnly 11% of 284 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 11% of 284 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Phrase key subheadings as the questions users actually ask ("How much does X cost?"). This improves the measured question-heading signal; the audit does not guarantee citations.

Could be better: Definitional openingThe opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "NEW…"

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "NEW…"

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

"X is a Y that does Z for W" in the first paragraph gives answer engines a liftable definition of you. Write it once, benefit everywhere.

Could be better: Freshness signalsNo dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

For content where dates matter, show the actual update date and mirror it in dateModified. Do not invent dates or change them without a substantive update. Missing dates alone do not prove stale content.

Could be better: Consistent brand entityThe site does not declare its name: no og:site_name and no Organization or WebSite schema.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The site does not declare its name: no og:site_name and no Organization or WebSite schema.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Declare the site's name once in Organization or WebSite schema and in og:site_name, using the same name as the title. Readers, search engines and AI assistants then attribute the pages to one named publisher.

Could be better: Question headings have concise answers0/31 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

0/31 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Put a direct 20–500 character answer paragraph immediately after each question heading so retrieval systems can quote it cleanly.

Affected pages (8)

  • https://www.file.ai/
  • https://www.file.ai/about
  • https://www.file.ai/pricing
  • https://www.file.ai/platform/fileforge
  • https://www.file.ai/fileforensics
  • https://www.file.ai/solutions/insurance
  • https://www.file.ai/blog
  • https://www.file.ai/industry-expertise
Could be better: Machine-readable provenance signalsOnly 3 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, date, contact.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Only 3 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, date, contact.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add the missing author, date, breadcrumb, or contact signal so machines can identify provenance and site structure.

Affected pages (10)

  • https://www.file.ai/
  • https://www.file.ai/about
  • https://www.file.ai/legal/privacy-policy
  • https://www.file.ai/customers
  • https://www.file.ai/pricing
  • https://www.file.ai/platform/fileforge
  • https://www.file.ai/fileforensics
  • https://www.file.ai/solutions/insurance
  • https://www.file.ai/blog
  • https://www.file.ai/industry-expertise
Could be better: Markdown copies of pagesNo markdown copy answered at /index.md or /about.md or /index.html.md.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No markdown copy answered at /index.md or /about.md or /index.html.md.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a clean markdown copy of each key page at /page.md (or /page.html.md). It strips navigation and scripts, so a retriever spends its budget on your content.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://www.file.ai/
  • https://www.file.ai/about
Reference
Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No /llms-full.txt.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.

Reference
Not measured: Authored, dated articlesNo Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add Article schema with author and datePublished so the page exposes clear provenance for retrieval. This audit does not measure or guarantee citations or rankings.

Not measured: Citable facts density27 concrete figures across 1504 words.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

27 concrete figures across 1504 words.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Good — keep facts specific and current, and date-stamp them.

Not applicable: Entity identity agrees across signalsThe page declares no site or organization name (no og:site_name and no Organization or WebSite schema name), so there is nothing to compare.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The page declares no site or organization name (no og:site_name and no Organization or WebSite schema name), so there is nothing to compare.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Declare the site's name once in Organization or WebSite schema and in og:site_name, and use the same name in the title.

Not measured: llms.txt follows the specNo readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish llms.txt first — the llms.txt check covers that — then this one verifies the structure.

Reference
Not applicable: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectableNo OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

An API is optional. Add a service-desc link if you already publish a machine-readable API specification.

Looks good: AI crawler access

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: FAQ/QA schema

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

FAQ/QA schema found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Answers lead the section

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs get to the point without preamble.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is chunkable

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs average 5 words, lists present — chunk-friendly.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Cites external sources

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

205 outbound reference(s) across crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Description reads as a liftable summary

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description works as a standalone summary.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Accept: text/markdown negotiation

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The homepage answers Accept: text/markdown with markdown.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AdSense readinessOptional

31/100

Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.

On its own, this site scores 36/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.

Needs a fix: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages1 sampled page(s) still read as unfinished — found "coming soon".

Needs a fix · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

1 sampled page(s) still read as unfinished — found "coming soon".

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Finish those pages, or redirect, noindex or remove them. Google policy prohibits ads on screens under construction.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://www.file.ai/pricing
Reference
Could be better: Sampled publisher-content coverage1/8 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 8 pages hold 5790 publisher words in total.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

1/8 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 8 pages hold 5790 publisher words in total. 2 of the 10 sampled pages are support or tool pages and were excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Review whether each page fully serves its purpose. Expand incomplete editorial content with useful information; keep concise navigation and tool pages when they help visitors.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://www.file.ai/customers
Reference
Could be better: Latest article has real depthThe newest article has 522 words of body text.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Measured on your pageCritical

Observed evidence

The newest article has 522 words of body text.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Check that the page covers the question end to end. Short is fine when the topic is small; it reads as thin when the title promises a guide.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://www.file.ai/blog/fileai-signs-strategic-collaboration-agreement-with-aws
Reference
Could be better: Contact methodNo contact page or mailto link found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No contact page or mailto link found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add a working contact route or visible email so users can reach the publisher. This is a trust heuristic, not a published approval rule.

Not measured: First-party contact emailA contact page or form exists, but no public email address was found.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

A contact page or form exists, but no public email address was found.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

A public email is optional. The separate contact-method check covers whether readers have a way to reach the publisher.

Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No ads.txt yet.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.

Reference
Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.

Reference
Looks good: Privacy policy page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Privacy policy found: https://www.file.ai/legal/privacy-policy

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Privacy policy advertising disclosures

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

Fetched privacy policy contains cookie/storage, advertising, and third-party/vendor disclosure signals.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Looks good: Terms page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Terms page found: ./legal/legal-terms

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: About page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

About page found: https://www.file.ai/about

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Thin page share

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

8/8 editorial pages clear the audit's publisher-content triage threshold. 2 of the 10 sampled pages are support or tool pages and were excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No ads on non-content screens

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Looks good: Tool pages expose explanatory content

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

All 10 sampled tool-style screens include crawlable explanation.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No high publisher-content repetition among 9 substantial sampled page(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content exists in source HTML

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No empty client-rendered publisher shell in the crawl sample.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Clear navigation

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Navigation present with 28 links.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Article-style content exists

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Article-style content detected.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language "en" is AdSense-supported.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Existing ad scripts

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No competing ad scripts on the page.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 4 more checks
Looks good: Author bylines on content

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Author attribution appears on all 2 sampled editorial pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change.

Reference
Looks good: Author or publisher background

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Discoverable author or publisher background supports all 2 attributed editorial pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change.

Reference
Looks good: Latest article reads as edited work

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Style pattern score 8/100 on the newest article. These are style patterns in the sampled text, not a determination of how the page was written.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Latest article names an author and a date

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The newest article shows both an author and a date.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Hosting and infrastructure

Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.

Hosting and infrastructure observations
Hostnamewww.file.ai
IP addresses31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6
DNS A31.43.160.6 · 31.43.161.6
DNS CNAMEsites.framer.app
TLSTLSv1.3TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
Certificate issuerLet's Encrypt / YE2
Certificate valid untilJan 21 05:23:51 2027 GMT
Certificate validationPassed

Website anatomy and diagnostics

Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.

Page architecture

Choose a page to explore its details and connections.

Page content

1086 publisher words

Page structure

html content

Observed discovery

Depth 0 · 9 incoming links

HTTP 200 · 539.1 KB source

Source interactions

129 controls · 0 unnamed

3 script / 0 stylesheet references

Canonical declaration
https://www.file.ai/
Schema types
None observed
Outgoing links in sampled graph
/customers · /pricing · /platform/fileforge · /platform/fileledger · /platform/fileshield · /fileforensics · /solutions/insurance · /solutions/other-industries · /solutions/bfs · /solutions/accounting · /about · /blog · /industry-expertise · /events · /book-a-demo · /customers/toshiba · /customers/nippon-paint · /legal/privacy-policy · /legal/legal-terms

Routes: / · /about · /legal · /customers · /pricing · /platform · /fileforensics · /solutions · /blog · /industry-expertise

Resource origins 3

Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.

  • https://framerusercontent.com/image, media, script · 678 references · cross origin
  • https://events.framer.com/script · 10 references · cross origin
  • https://js-na2.hs-scripts.com/script · 10 references · cross origin
Crawler policy by page

Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.

Robots policy for every evaluated crawler and sampled page
Crawler / purposePagePolicyMatched directive
Googlebotsearch/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/aboutallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/customersallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blogallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/aboutallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/customersallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blogallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/aboutallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/customersallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blogallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/aboutallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/customersallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blogallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/aboutallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/customersallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blogallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/aboutallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/customersallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/pricingallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blogallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/aboutallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/customersallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/pricingallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blogallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/aboutallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/customersallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/pricingallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blogallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/aboutallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/legal/privacy-policyallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/customersallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/pricingallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/platform/fileforgeallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/fileforensicsallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/solutions/insuranceallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blogallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/industry-expertiseallowedallow: /
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces

No supported machine interfaces were advertised in the sampled HTML. An API or MCP server is optional; undiscovered interfaces remain unknown.

Public DNS and TLS endpoint

www.file.ai · observed · 31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6

A
31.43.160.6 · 31.43.161.6
AAAA
Unavailable for this exact hostname
CNAME
sites.framer.app
NS
Unavailable for this exact hostname
MX
Unavailable for this exact hostname
CAA
Unavailable for this exact hostname

TLS: TLSv1.3

Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.

Issuer: Let's Encrypt / YE2

Certificate valid until: Jan 21 05:23:51 2027 GMT

PageSpeed measurement

Loading the PageSpeed panel…

Growth resources

Loading growth resources…

Where to take this site next

Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.

  1. 01

    Fix the fundamentals first

    Your top fixes list is the priority order — clear the red items before creating more content.

  2. 02

    Re-run the combined audit after each batch of fixes

    Re-run after fixes to see which checks changed; score bands are guidance, not a guarantee of ranking, traffic, or approval.

  3. 03

    Fix AdSense policy signals

    Make policy pages, publisher disclosures and substantial content reachable before applying. This audit cannot predict approval.

Apply the recommended fixes

Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.

Open in ChatGPT Open in Grok Open in Perplexity

Report notes

  • 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
  • 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
  • 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
  • https://www.file.ai/
  • https://www.file.ai/about
  • https://www.file.ai/legal/privacy-policy
  • https://www.file.ai/customers
  • https://www.file.ai/pricing
  • https://www.file.ai/platform/fileforge
  • https://www.file.ai/fileforensics
  • https://www.file.ai/solutions/insurance
  • https://www.file.ai/blog
  • https://www.file.ai/industry-expertise