Website report

Visit sitehttps://fleeep.app/

A free notes and inspiration app for designers, writers and creatives. Save notes, photos, links, voice notes, sketches and palettes, then find them fast.

Audit Full discovery audit·Language English (en)·Response HTTP 200·Served by Cloudflare

Analysed Nov 9, 2026 · 15 categories · 116 passed · 13 warnings · 2 issues · 19 informational

Audit score

C

83/100

Mixed

Agentic
100
SEO
83

What we found

2Needs a fix13Could be better116Looks good19Informational
  1. 1.Needs a fix: HTTP redirects to HTTPS: needs fixing. see checkThese protections reduce risks for your website and its visitors.
  2. 2.Needs a fix: Homepage content volume: needs fixing. see checkUseful, specific content gives visitors answers and a reason to stay.
  3. 3.Could be better: Title and H1 agree: needs attention. see checkUseful, specific content gives visitors answers and a reason to stay.
  4. 4.Could be better: Your content security policy needs work. see checkThis policy limits which scripts and resources can run on your website.
  5. 5.Could be better: Your browser permission rules need tightening. see checkRestricting camera, microphone and location access limits unnecessary permissions.

Built with 2 technologies· detected stack

Read from the public source and response headers of the sampled pages.

InfrastructureType
  • CloudflareCDN / edge
Payments and servicesType
  • Google FontsFont integration

A framework or CDN signal describes the public response, not the origin host or private backend.

Site checks

116 passed · 13 warnings · 2 issues

Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.

Metadata11Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Page title exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title found: "Fleeep: a free notes and inspiration app for creatives"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title is 54 characters, inside this audit's 15–60 review range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title says what the site does

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title "Fleeep: a free notes and inspiration app for creatives" says more than the site name.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description found: "A free notes and inspiration app for designers, writers and creatives. Save notes, photos,…"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Description is 154 characters and inside this audit's 70–160 preview range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Titles unique across pages

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 9 indexable sampled pages have distinct titles.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Character encoding declared

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

UTF-8 declared in a meta tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTML5 doctype

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HTML5 doctype declared.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta keywords tag

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No obsolete meta keywords tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Indexing16Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Single canonical declaration

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

One canonical declaration found.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No meta-refresh redirect.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No soft-404 response

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical target integrity

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Indexability signals align across 9 sampled URL(s).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 10 more checks
Looks good: robots.txt exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt responds with 200.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. Most specific matching path; allow wins equal-length conflicts.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap found at https://fleeep.app/sitemap.xml.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap parses and lists URLs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap lists 11 same-origin URLs.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap declared in robots.txt

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt declares the sitemap.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical URL set

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical set: https://fleeep.app/

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is absolute and points at this page.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: www vs apex consistency

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Hostname is used consistently (fleeep.app).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: URLs are readable slugs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

URL slugs are readable (11 sampled).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No restrictive search-access signal on 9 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Content1Needs a fix1Could be better8Looks good1Informational

100/100
Needs a fix: Homepage content volumeThe audited page has about 31 words of main content (navigation, header and footer excluded).

Needs a fix · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The audited page has about 31 words of main content (navigation, header and footer excluded).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Add substance: what the site is, who it's for, what problems it solves. This audit measures visible HTML; it does not measure rankings, traffic, or content originality. Note: if your content renders only via client-side JS, crawlers without JS (and this checker) can't see it — prefer server rendering.

Could be better: Title and H1 agreeTitle ("Fleeep: a free notes and inspiration app for creat…") and H1 ("Every idea, close at hand.") share no significant words.

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title ("Fleeep: a free notes and inspiration app for creat…") and H1 ("Every idea, close at hand.") share no significant words.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Align them around the same core topic — mixed signals confuse both rankers and readers.

Not applicable: ReadabilityNot enough English prose to estimate readability (it needs about 100 words in three or more sentences).

Not applicable · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Not enough English prose to estimate readability (it needs about 100 words in three or more sentences).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change for this check.

Looks good: Crawlable content in source HTML

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No recognized empty JavaScript application shell on 9 sampled page(s). The entered page exposes 31 publisher word(s).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Text-to-HTML ratio

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Text-to-HTML ratio is 6.6%.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No placeholder text

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: No starter-template leftovers

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No starter-template artifacts detected.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicates

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No near-duplicate main content among 8 indexable sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No deprecated HTML tags

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No deprecated HTML tags.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Outbound references

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

2 outbound link(s) present.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pages

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No repeated description, H1, or publisher copy across 9 sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Social sharing8Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Open Graph title

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:title: "Fleeep: Every idea, close at hand."

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph description

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:description: "A free notes and inspiration app. Save notes, photos, links, voice notes and colours in a …"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph image

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image is set: "https://fleeep.app/og.png"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image loads

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image returns 200 (image/png).

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image dimensions declared

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Dimensions declared: 1200×630.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:url and og:type

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:url and og:type ("website") are set.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Twitter/X card

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

twitter:card is "summary_large_image".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:site_name

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:site_name: "Fleeep".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Structured data5Looks good

100/100
Looks good: JSON-LD present

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 JSON-LD block(s) found on the homepage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: JSON-LD parses

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 15 JSON-LD block(s) parse cleanly.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Organization or WebSite schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Identity schema present: Organization, WebSite.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Breadcrumb schema on inner pages

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

7/8 inner pages have breadcrumb schema.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content-specific schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Content schema found: Offer, FAQPage, WebApplication.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Headings7Looks good

100/100
Looks good: H1 exists

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 found: "Every idea, close at hand."

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Single H1

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Exactly one H1 on the homepage.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Heading levels don't skip

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Heading hierarchy is sequential across 11 headings.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: H1 has real text

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 reads "Every idea, close at hand.".

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Headings are descriptive

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

11 headings, averaging 4.7 words — descriptive.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is sectioned with H2s

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

6 H2 section(s) structure the page.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Element IDs are unique per document

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All inspected element IDs are unique within their documents.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Images4Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Alt text coverage

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 10 visible images declare alt attributes (including empty alt for decorative images). Whether each description fits its image needs a human look.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Width/height attributes

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 10 visible images declare dimensions or are sized by their container.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Modern image formats

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

10 of 10 raster images have a WebP/AVIF source or come from a format-negotiating image service.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Lazy loading

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

10/10 images are lazy-loaded.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Mobile4Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not applicable: Responsive image markupNone of the 10 images use srcset.

Not applicable · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

None of the 10 images use srcset.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Serve smaller variants to phones with srcset/sizes (next/image handles this) — mobile users shouldn't download desktop-sized images.

Not measured: No tiny inline font sizesNo sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Not measured · Mobile · Not established

Observed evidence

No sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Check computed font sizes in a browser across mobile widths.

Looks good: Viewport meta tag

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Viewport configured: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1, viewport-fit=cover".

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The viewport lets users zoom.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Interactive controls have source labels

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

322 source controls have detectable names. Browser accessibility and CSS visibility were not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: ARIA references point to source elements

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 ARIA reference(s) resolve within their source documents. Rendered visibility was not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Language1Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not applicable: hreflang syntaxNo hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Not applicable · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Only add hreflang if you publish the same content in multiple languages/regions.

Not applicable: Declared language matches contentNot enough text on the page to tell which language it is written in.

Not applicable · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Not enough text on the page to tell which language it is written in.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change for this check. Confirm the lang attribute names the language most of the page is written in.

Looks good: html lang attribute

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language declared: lang="en".

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Branding4Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Favicon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (/icons/favicon.svg).

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Apple touch icon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

apple-touch-icon is declared.

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Web app manifest

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Web manifest links and parses correctly.

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Theme color

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

theme-color is "#FAFAFA".

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Performance

100/100

Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.

Performance measurements observed during the audit
MeasureThis siteReading
Server response time234 msLooks good: goodThe audit received response headers after 234 ms from one test location.
HTML payload size55 KBLooks good: goodThe page's HTML is a lean 55 KB uncompressed.
No render-blocking head scripts—Looks good: goodNo synchronous render-blocking scripts in <head>.
Inline styles are bounded12.9 KBLooks good: goodInline styles total 12.9 KB.
Script/stylesheet count—Looks good: good4 total script/style resources — reasonable.
Web fonts don't block text—Looks good: goodGoogle Fonts links set a non-blocking font-display value.
HTML served compressed—Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br.
Iframe usage—Looks good: goodNo iframes.
Source HTML weight54.6 KBInformational: measured source, not transferred bytes54.6 KB of HTML on the audited page

From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.

Security

70/100

HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.

Needs a fix: HTTP redirects to HTTPSThe http:// version serves content instead of redirecting.

Needs a fix · Security · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

The http:// version serves content instead of redirecting.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

301-redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS — otherwise you have duplicate origins and users can land on the insecure one.

Could be better: Content Security PolicyA CSP is present but its script or object restrictions need review.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

A CSP is present but its script or object restrictions need review.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Restrict script origins, use nonces or hashes for inline scripts, avoid unsafe evaluation, and set object-src 'none'.

Could be better: Browser feature permissionsNo explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Disable unused camera, microphone, or geolocation access using Permissions-Policy.

Not applicable: Declared form submission targetsNo HTML forms were found.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No HTML forms were found.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Check JavaScript-generated form transport separately if present.

Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Review authentication forms separately when applicable.

Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Site serves over HTTPS.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HSTS header

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HSTS is set: max-age=31536000.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Frame embedding protection

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Response headers restrict cross-origin framing (frame-ancestors 'none').

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Referrer policy

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Referrer-Policy is same-origin.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: X-Content-Type-Options

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

nosniff is set.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No mixed content

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No insecure subresources detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Server technology disclosure

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No X-Powered-By disclosure.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AI answer readiness

100/100

Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.

Could be better: llms.txtNo /llms.txt file.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No /llms.txt file.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Optional: publish an llms.txt index of useful pages. This proposal is not a requirement for Google AI features, and its absence does not reduce the core score.

Reference
Could be better: Question-style headingsOnly 5% of 95 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 5% of 95 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Phrase key subheadings as the questions users actually ask ("How much does X cost?"). This improves the measured question-heading signal; the audit does not guarantee citations.

Could be better: Definitional openingThe opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Features…"

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Features…"

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

"X is a Y that does Z for W" in the first paragraph gives answer engines a liftable definition of you. Write it once, benefit everywhere.

Could be better: Freshness signalsNo dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

For content where dates matter, show the actual update date and mirror it in dateModified. Do not invent dates or change them without a substantive update. Missing dates alone do not prove stale content.

Could be better: Markdown copies of pagesNo markdown copy answered at /index.md or /privacy/index.md or /index.html.md.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No markdown copy answered at /index.md or /privacy/index.md or /index.html.md.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a clean markdown copy of each key page at /page.md (or /page.html.md). It strips navigation and scripts, so a retriever spends its budget on your content.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://fleeep.app/
  • https://fleeep.app/privacy/
Reference
Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No /llms-full.txt.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.

Reference
Not measured: Authored, dated articlesNo Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add Article schema with author and datePublished so the page exposes clear provenance for retrieval. This audit does not measure or guarantee citations or rankings.

Not measured: Citable facts density9 concrete figures across 440 words.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

9 concrete figures across 440 words.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Good — keep facts specific and current, and date-stamp them.

Not measured: llms.txt follows the specNo readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish llms.txt first — the llms.txt check covers that — then this one verifies the structure.

Reference
Not applicable: Accept: text/markdown negotiationThe homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Optional: return a stripped markdown body when the request asks for text/markdown. Some hosts and CDNs do this for you; a plain HTML answer is not a defect.

Not applicable: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectableNo OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

An API is optional. Add a service-desc link if you already publish a machine-readable API specification.

Looks good: AI crawler access

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: FAQ/QA schema

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

FAQ/QA schema found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Semantic HTML structure

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Semantic structure present: main×1, article×4, section×6, nav×1, header×1, footer×1.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Answers lead the section

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs get to the point without preamble.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is chunkable

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs average 15 words, lists present — chunk-friendly.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Cites external sources

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

18 outbound reference(s) across crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Consistent brand entity

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Brand declared: og:site_name "Fleeep" + identity schema.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Description reads as a liftable summary

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description works as a standalone summary.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Entity identity agrees across signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The site is consistently named "Fleeep" and 6 identity URL(s) stay on fleeep.app.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Question headings have concise answers

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

5 concise answer block(s) follow 5 question-shaped heading(s).

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Machine-readable provenance signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Found 4 of 4 machine-readable provenance signal types: contact, author, date, breadcrumb.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AdSense readinessOptional

38/100

Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.

On its own, this site scores 45/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.

Could be better: Privacy policy advertising disclosuresFetched privacy policy lacks third-party/vendor disclosure signals.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Published platform ruleCritical

Observed evidence

Fetched privacy policy lacks third-party/vendor disclosure signals.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Describe data collection, sharing, and cookie use by Google and other third-party ad vendors.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://fleeep.app/privacy/
Reference
Could be better: Sampled publisher-content coverage1/8 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 8 pages hold 2870 publisher words in total.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

1/8 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 8 pages hold 2870 publisher words in total. 1 of the 9 sampled pages is a support or tool page and was excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Review whether each page fully serves its purpose. Expand incomplete editorial content with useful information; keep concise navigation and tool pages when they help visitors.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://fleeep.app/
Reference
Could be better: About pageNo about page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No about page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an About page that identifies the publisher, site purpose, and relevant experience. This supports content transparency but is not a standalone AdSense requirement.

Could be better: Tool pages expose explanatory content1/9 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/9 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words. Google publishes no minimum word count; this is an audit heuristic.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Explain the tool's purpose, inputs, method, limitations, and result interpretation in source HTML. Add useful material, not filler.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://fleeep.app/
Reference
Could be better: Author or publisher background1/1 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/1 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Link the byline to an author profile or About page, or add truthful structured author details. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense approval rule.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://fleeep.app/
Reference
Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No ads.txt yet.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.

Reference
Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article has real depthNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reads the newest one.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article reads as edited workNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reviews its style signals.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article names an author and a dateNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then looks for its byline and date.

Reference
Looks good: Privacy policy page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Privacy policy found: https://fleeep.app/privacy/

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Terms page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Terms page found: /terms/

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Contact method

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Contact email found: mailto:support@fleeep.app

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: First-party contact email

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

First-party contact email found: support@fleeep.app.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Thin page share

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

7/8 editorial pages clear the audit's publisher-content triage threshold. 1 of the 9 sampled pages is a support or tool page and was excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No ads on non-content screens

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No high publisher-content repetition among 8 substantial sampled page(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content exists in source HTML

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No empty client-rendered publisher shell in the crawl sample.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Clear navigation

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Navigation present with 19 links.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Article-style content exists

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Article-style content detected.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No "coming soon", "under construction" or lorem-ipsum text on crawled pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 4 more checks
Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language "en" is AdSense-supported.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Existing ad scripts

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No competing ad scripts on the page.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Author bylines on content

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Author attribution appears on all 1 sampled editorial pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change.

Reference

Hosting and infrastructure

Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.

Hosting and infrastructure observations
Hostnamefleeep.app
CDN / edgeCloudflare
IP addresses104.21.59.85, 172.67.220.63, 2606:4700:3033::ac43:dc3f, 2606:4700:3032::6815:3b55
DNS A104.21.59.85 · 172.67.220.63
DNS AAAA2606:4700:3033::ac43:dc3f · 2606:4700:3032::6815:3b55
DNS NSmiki.ns.cloudflare.com · alfred.ns.cloudflare.com
DNS MX4 route2.mx.cloudflare.net · 49 route3.mx.cloudflare.net · 98 route1.mx.cloudflare.net
TLSTLSv1.3TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Certificate issuerGoogle Trust Services / WE1
Certificate valid untilJan 30 13:54:06 2027 GMT
Certificate validationPassed

Website anatomy and diagnostics

Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.

Page architecture

Choose a page to explore its details and connections.

Page content

31 publisher words

Page structure

html content

Observed discovery

Depth 0 · 8 incoming links

HTTP 200 · 54.6 KB source

Source interactions

30 controls · 0 unnamed

2 script / 2 stylesheet references

Canonical declaration
https://fleeep.app/
Schema types
WebSite, Organization, WebApplication, Offer
Outgoing links in sampled graph
/notes-app/ · /inspiration-app/ · /moodboard-app/ · /colour-palettes/ · /voice-notes/ · /for/designers/ · /for/writers/ · /faq/ · /app · /app · /terms/ · /privacy/

Routes: / · /privacy · /notes-app · /inspiration-app · /moodboard-app · /colour-palettes · /voice-notes · /for · /faq

Resource origins 3

Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.

  • https://fleeep.app/stylesheet, image, script · 62 references · same origin
  • https://fonts.googleapis.com/stylesheet · 9 references · cross origin
  • https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/script · 9 references · cross origin
Crawler policy by page

Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.

Robots policy for every evaluated crawler and sampled page
Crawler / purposePagePolicyMatched directive
Googlebotsearch/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/privacy/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/notes-app/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/for/designers/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/faq/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/privacy/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/notes-app/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/for/designers/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/faq/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/privacy/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/notes-app/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/for/designers/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/faq/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/privacy/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/notes-app/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/for/designers/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/faq/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/privacy/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/notes-app/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/for/designers/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/faq/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/privacy/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/notes-app/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/for/designers/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/faq/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/privacy/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/notes-app/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/for/designers/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/faq/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/privacy/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/notes-app/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/for/designers/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/faq/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/privacy/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/notes-app/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/inspiration-app/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/moodboard-app/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/colour-palettes/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/voice-notes/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/for/designers/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/faq/allowedallow: /
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces

No supported machine interfaces were advertised in the sampled HTML. An API or MCP server is optional; undiscovered interfaces remain unknown.

Public DNS and TLS endpoint

fleeep.app · observed · 104.21.59.85, 172.67.220.63, 2606:4700:3033::ac43:dc3f, 2606:4700:3032::6815:3b55

A
104.21.59.85 · 172.67.220.63
AAAA
2606:4700:3033::ac43:dc3f · 2606:4700:3032::6815:3b55
CNAME
Unavailable for this exact hostname
NS
miki.ns.cloudflare.com · alfred.ns.cloudflare.com
MX
4 route2.mx.cloudflare.net · 49 route3.mx.cloudflare.net · 98 route1.mx.cloudflare.net
CAA
Unavailable for this exact hostname

TLS: TLSv1.3

Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.

Issuer: Google Trust Services / WE1

Certificate valid until: Jan 30 13:54:06 2027 GMT

PageSpeed measurement

Loading the PageSpeed panel…

Growth resources

Loading growth resources…

Where to take this site next

Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.

  1. 01

    Build content depth around real keywords

    Technical basics are in place — use pages that answer actual searches as the next content focus. This audit does not measure rankings.

  2. 02

    Steal from our keyword datasets

    Curated keyword collections by niche give you a content calendar without paid tools.

Apply the recommended fixes

Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.

Open in ChatGPT Open in Grok Open in Perplexity

Report notes

  • 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
  • 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
  • 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
  • https://fleeep.app/
  • https://fleeep.app/privacy/
  • https://fleeep.app/notes-app/
  • https://fleeep.app/inspiration-app/
  • https://fleeep.app/moodboard-app/
  • https://fleeep.app/colour-palettes/
  • https://fleeep.app/voice-notes/
  • https://fleeep.app/for/designers/
  • https://fleeep.app/faq/