Website report

Visit sitehttps://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/

Interactive world exploration with Atlas.

Audit Full discovery audit·Language English (en)·Response HTTP 200·Served by Vercel

Analysed Nov 9, 2026 · 15 categories · 60 passed · 24 warnings · 4 issues · 62 informational

Partial evidence; some observations were unavailable.

Audit score

F

38/100

Needs work

Agentic
58
SEO
40

What we found

4Needs a fix24Could be better60Looks good62Informational
  1. 1.Needs a fix: Your page has no main heading. see checkThe main heading gives visitors and search engines a clear topic.
  2. 2.Needs a fix: Homepage content volume: needs fixing. see checkUseful, specific content gives visitors answers and a reason to stay.
  3. 3.Could be better: Crawlable content in source HTML: needs attention. see checkUseful, specific content gives visitors answers and a reason to stay.
  4. 4.Could be better: Your site has no sitemap. see checkA sitemap helps search engines discover your pages.
  5. 5.Could be better: Semantic HTML structure: needs attention. see checkClear, accessible information helps AI assistants understand and cite your website.

Built with 1 technology· detected stack

Read from the public source and response headers of the sampled pages.

Hosting and deploymentType
  • VercelHosting / edge

A framework or CDN signal describes the public response, not the origin host or private backend.

Site checks

60 passed · 24 warnings · 4 issues

Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.

Metadata1Could be better9Looks good1Informational

89/100
Could be better: Meta description lengthDescription is 41 characters, under this audit's 70-character review point (a heuristic, not a Google minimum).

Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Description is 41 characters, under this audit's 70-character review point (a heuristic, not a Google minimum).

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add useful context if the summary omits the page purpose. Do not pad it or force keywords to reach a count.

Not measured: Titles unique across pagesFewer than two indexable pages with a title were sampled, so titles can't be compared.

Not measured · Metadata · Not established

Observed evidence

Fewer than two indexable pages with a title were sampled, so titles can't be compared.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Link your main pages from the homepage so crawlers (including this one) can find them.

Looks good: Page title exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title found: "Frameboy: Atlas in Real-Time"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title is 28 characters, inside this audit's 15–60 review range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title says what the site does

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title "Frameboy: Atlas in Real-Time" says more than the site name.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description found: "Interactive world exploration with Atlas."

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Character encoding declared

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

UTF-8 declared in the Content-Type header and a meta tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTML5 doctype

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HTML5 doctype declared.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta keywords tag

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No obsolete meta keywords tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Indexing1Could be better10Looks good5Informational

76/100
Could be better: Sitemap existsNo sitemap found (checked https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/sitemap.xml → 404).

Could be better · Indexing · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No sitemap found (checked https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/sitemap.xml → 404).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a sitemap.xml and submit it in Google Search Console. Next.js: export from app/sitemap.ts — it's ~10 lines.

Reference
Not applicable: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signalsNo sitemap was found, so there are no submitted URLs to compare against.

Not applicable · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No sitemap was found, so there are no submitted URLs to compare against.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

The sitemap check covers the missing file. Once one exists, this check confirms the URLs it lists are indexable.

Not applicable: robots.txt existsrobots.txt is absent.

Not applicable · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt is absent. A missing policy permits crawling by default.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Optional: publish a robots policy to advertise a sitemap or restrict selected paths.

Not measured: Sitemap parses and lists URLsNo sitemap was reachable, so its contents cannot be validated.

Not measured · Indexing · Not established

Observed evidence

No sitemap was reachable, so its contents cannot be validated.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish /sitemap.xml with your canonical URLs. This check then validates the XML and the URLs it lists.

Not applicable: Sitemap declared in robots.txtNo sitemap was reachable, so robots.txt has nothing to point at.

Not applicable · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No sitemap was reachable, so robots.txt has nothing to point at.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Publish the sitemap first, then add a Sitemap: line to robots.txt naming its absolute URL.

Not measured: URLs are readable slugsThe crawl reached no inner URLs, so URL readability cannot be assessed.

Not measured · Indexing · Not established

Observed evidence

The crawl reached no inner URLs, so URL readability cannot be assessed.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Link your inner pages from the homepage so they can be crawled. This check then reviews their path structure.

Show 10 more checks
Looks good: Single canonical declaration

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

One canonical declaration found.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No meta-refresh redirect.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No soft-404 response

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical target integrity

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. HTTP 404: no available robots policy.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical URL set

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical set: https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is absolute and points at this page.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: www vs apex consistency

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Hostname is used consistently (frameboy.worldlabs.ai).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No restrictive search-access signal on 1 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Content1Needs a fix2Could be better4Looks good4Informational

42/100
Needs a fix: Homepage content volumeThe audited page has about 0 words of main content (navigation, header and footer excluded).

Needs a fix · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The audited page has about 0 words of main content (navigation, header and footer excluded).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Add substance: what the site is, who it's for, what problems it solves. This audit measures visible HTML; it does not measure rankings, traffic, or content originality. Note: if your content renders only via client-side JS, crawlers without JS (and this checker) can't see it — prefer server rendering.

Could be better: Crawlable content in source HTML1 sampled page(s) expose fewer than 30 publisher words and an empty application root with script references.

Could be better · Content · Published platform ruleCritical

Observed evidence

1 sampled page(s) expose fewer than 30 publisher words and an empty application root with script references.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Server-render or statically render the page's primary content. Google can render JavaScript, but rendering can fail or be delayed and other crawlers may not execute it.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/
Reference
Could be better: Text-to-HTML ratioVisible text is 0.0% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Visible text is 0.0% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Text-to-HTML ratio is not a ranking factor, but a very low value often means deeply nested markup or content that only appears after JavaScript runs. Check the source-content checks before changing anything.

Not applicable: ReadabilityNot enough English prose to estimate readability (it needs about 100 words in three or more sentences).

Not applicable · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Not enough English prose to estimate readability (it needs about 100 words in three or more sentences).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change for this check.

Not applicable: Title and H1 agreeNeed both a <title> and an H1 to compare them.

Not applicable · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Need both a <title> and an H1 to compare them.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Add whichever is missing — the metadata and headings checks name it — then this check confirms the two describe the same topic.

Not measured: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicatesOnly one page was sampled, so there is nothing to compare.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Only one page was sampled, so there is nothing to compare.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Link your main pages from the homepage so the audit can sample and compare them.

Show 5 more checks
Not measured: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pagesOnly one distinct content page was sampled, so repeated discovery copy cannot be compared.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Only one distinct content page was sampled, so repeated discovery copy cannot be compared.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Sample at least two substantial URLs so repeated descriptions, H1s, and publisher text can be checked.

Looks good: No placeholder text

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No starter-template leftovers

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No starter-template artifacts detected.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No deprecated HTML tags

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No deprecated HTML tags.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Outbound references

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

0 outbound link(s) present.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Social sharing8Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Open Graph title

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:title: "Frameboy: Atlas in Real-Time"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph description

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:description: "Interactive world exploration with Atlas."

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph image

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image is set: "https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/frameboy-opengraph.jpg"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image loads

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image returns 200 (image/jpeg).

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image dimensions declared

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Dimensions declared: 1200×749.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:url and og:type

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:url and og:type ("website") are set.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Twitter/X card

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

twitter:card is "summary_large_image".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:site_name

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:site_name: "Frameboy".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Structured dataNot measured

Not measured
Could be better: JSON-LD presentNo JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.

Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add Organization and WebSite schema. They state who publishes the site and what it is called, which is what rich results and answer engines read first.

Reference
Could be better: Organization or WebSite schemaNo Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.

Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an identity node so search engines and AI assistants can attribute your content to a real entity.

Reference
Not applicable: JSON-LD parsesNo JSON-LD blocks were found, so there is no syntax to validate.

Not applicable · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No JSON-LD blocks were found, so there is no syntax to validate.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Add a <script type="application/ld+json"> block describing the page — Organization or WebSite is the usual starting point.

Not measured: Breadcrumb schema on inner pagesNo inner pages crawled.

Not measured · Structured data · Not established

Observed evidence

No inner pages crawled.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Not applicable until inner pages exist.

Not applicable: Content-specific schemaNo content-specific schema (Article, Product, FAQPage…) detected.

Not applicable · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No content-specific schema (Article, Product, FAQPage…) detected.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

If you publish articles, products or FAQs, add the matching schema type — that's what makes rich results (stars, FAQs, prices) possible.

Reference

Headings1Needs a fix1Looks good5Informational

6/100
Needs a fix: H1 existsThe audited page has no <h1>.

Needs a fix · Headings · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

The audited page has no <h1>.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Add one <h1> stating what the page is about, usually the hero headline. Search engines, screen readers and answer engines use it as the page's main heading.

Not applicable: Single H1No H1 exists to check for uniqueness.

Not applicable · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No H1 exists to check for uniqueness.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

The H1 presence check covers the missing main heading.

Not applicable: Heading levels don't skipThe page has no headings, so there is nothing further to assess.

Not applicable · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The page has no headings, so there is nothing further to assess.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

The H1 presence check covers the missing headings. Add an H1 and descriptive H2 sections.

Not applicable: H1 has real textNo H1 text exists to inspect.

Not applicable · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No H1 text exists to inspect.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

The H1 presence check covers the missing main heading.

Not applicable: Headings are descriptiveThe page has no headings, so there is nothing further to assess.

Not applicable · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The page has no headings, so there is nothing further to assess.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

The H1 presence check covers the missing headings. Add an H1 and descriptive H2 sections.

Not applicable: Content is sectioned with H2sThe page has no headings, so there is nothing further to assess.

Not applicable · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The page has no headings, so there is nothing further to assess.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

The H1 presence check covers the missing headings. Add an H1 and descriptive H2 sections.

Looks good: Element IDs are unique per document

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All inspected element IDs are unique within their documents.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

ImagesNot applicable

Not measured
Not applicable: Alt text coverageNo visible <img> elements on the audited page (hidden, presentational and 1×1 tracking images are not counted).

Not applicable · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No visible <img> elements on the audited page (hidden, presentational and 1×1 tracking images are not counted).

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change here. Any image you add later needs alt text that describes it, so this check starts scoring then.

Not applicable: Width/height attributesNo visible <img> elements to measure on the audited page.

Not applicable · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No visible <img> elements to measure on the audited page.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change here. Give future images explicit width and height attributes so the browser can reserve their space.

Not applicable: Modern image formatsNo raster images with a recognizable file extension were found.

Not applicable · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No raster images with a recognizable file extension were found.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change here. If images arrive later, serve WebP or AVIF alongside PNG/JPEG.

Not applicable: Lazy loadingOnly 0 visible image(s) on the page, too few for lazy loading to change the initial load.

Not applicable · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Only 0 visible image(s) on the page, too few for lazy loading to change the initial load.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change here. Once the page carries several images, add loading="lazy" to the ones below the fold.

Mobile2Looks good4Informational

100/100
Not applicable: Responsive image markupOnly 0 image(s) on the page, too few for responsive image markup to change what phones download.

Not applicable · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Only 0 image(s) on the page, too few for responsive image markup to change what phones download.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change here. When the page carries several images, give them srcset and sizes so phones fetch smaller files.

Not measured: No tiny inline font sizesNo sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Not measured · Mobile · Not established

Observed evidence

No sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Check computed font sizes in a browser across mobile widths.

Not applicable: Interactive controls have source labelsNo source-level interactive controls were found.

Not applicable · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No source-level interactive controls were found.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Inspect browser-rendered controls separately if the page adds interactions with JavaScript.

Not applicable: ARIA references point to source elementsNo ARIA ID references found in the sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No ARIA ID references found in the sampled HTML.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Verify rendered accessibility separately.

Looks good: Viewport meta tag

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Viewport configured: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, viewport-fit=cover".

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The viewport lets users zoom.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Language1Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not applicable: hreflang syntaxNo hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Not applicable · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Only add hreflang if you publish the same content in multiple languages/regions.

Not applicable: Declared language matches contentNot enough text on the page to tell which language it is written in.

Not applicable · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Not enough text on the page to tell which language it is written in.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change for this check. Confirm the lang attribute names the language most of the page is written in.

Looks good: html lang attribute

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language declared: lang="en".

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Branding2Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not measured: Web app manifestNo web manifest linked.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No web manifest linked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional, but a manifest.json enables install prompts and better mobile integration.

Not measured: Theme colorNo theme-color meta tag.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No theme-color meta tag.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add <meta name="theme-color"> to tint the mobile browser UI to your brand color. Small touch, feels polished.

Looks good: Favicon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (/favicon.png).

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Apple touch icon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

apple-touch-icon is declared.

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Performance

100/100

Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.

Performance measurements observed during the audit
MeasureThis siteReading
Web fonts don't block text—Informational: not applicableNo Google Fonts stylesheet links detected.
Server response time116 msLooks good: goodThe audit received response headers after 116 ms from one test location.
HTML payload size2 KBLooks good: goodThe page's HTML is a lean 2 KB uncompressed.
No render-blocking head scripts—Looks good: goodNo synchronous render-blocking scripts in <head>.
Inline styles are bounded0.0 KBLooks good: goodInline styles total 0.0 KB.
Script/stylesheet count—Looks good: good2 total script/style resources — reasonable.
HTML served compressed—Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br.
Iframe usage—Looks good: goodNo iframes.
Source HTML weight2.0 KBInformational: measured source, not transferred bytes2.0 KB of HTML on the audited page

From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.

Security

86/100

HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.

Could be better: Frame embedding protectionNo frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Send Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' (or 'none', or a list of partner origins), or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN. It stops other sites from framing your pages to trick visitors into clicking (clickjacking).

Reference
Could be better: X-Content-Type-OptionsX-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is not set.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is not set.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add it — one header, stops MIME-sniffing attacks. Most hosts let you set headers in config (vercel.json, netlify.toml, next.config).

Could be better: Content Security PolicyNo Content-Security-Policy detected.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Content-Security-Policy detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Configure an enforced policy for script and resource origins; use report-only monitoring to prepare changes safely.

Reference
Could be better: Browser feature permissionsNo explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Disable unused camera, microphone, or geolocation access using Permissions-Policy.

Not applicable: Declared form submission targetsNo HTML forms were found.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No HTML forms were found.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Check JavaScript-generated form transport separately if present.

Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Review authentication forms separately when applicable.

Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Site serves over HTTPS.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTTP redirects to HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

http:// permanently redirects to https://./

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HSTS header

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HSTS is set: max-age=63072000.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Referrer policy

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No Referrer-Policy is set, so browsers apply their default, strict-origin-when-cross-origin, which sends only the origin to other sites.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No mixed content

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No insecure subresources detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Server technology disclosure

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No X-Powered-By disclosure.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AI answer readiness

67/100

Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.

Could be better: Semantic HTML structureThe homepage uses no semantic landmarks (main/article/section/nav…) — div soup.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The homepage uses no semantic landmarks (main/article/section/nav…) — div soup.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Wrap content in semantic elements. Parsers extracting your content for AI answers use these landmarks to find the substance and skip the chrome.

Reference
Could be better: llms.txtNo /llms.txt file.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No /llms.txt file.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Optional: publish an llms.txt index of useful pages. This proposal is not a requirement for Google AI features, and its absence does not reduce the core score.

Reference
Could be better: FAQ/QA schemaNo FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

If the page answers recurring questions, use visible question-and-answer content and matching FAQPage markup. QAPage is for a single question with user-submitted answers. Google FAQ rich results are restricted to eligible authoritative government and health sites; markup does not guarantee AI citations.

Reference
Could be better: Freshness signalsNo dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

For content where dates matter, show the actual update date and mirror it in dateModified. Do not invent dates or change them without a substantive update. Missing dates alone do not prove stale content.

Could be better: Cites external sourcesNo outbound links on any crawled page.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No outbound links on any crawled page.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Cite sources for factual claims. This makes source links observable to readers and crawlers; the audit does not measure or guarantee citations or rankings.

Could be better: Markdown copies of pagesNo markdown copy answered at /index.md or /index.html.md.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No markdown copy answered at /index.md or /index.html.md.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a clean markdown copy of each key page at /page.md (or /page.html.md). It strips navigation and scripts, so a retriever spends its budget on your content.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/
Reference
Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No /llms-full.txt.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.

Reference
Not measured: Authored, dated articlesNo Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add Article schema with author and datePublished so the page exposes clear provenance for retrieval. This audit does not measure or guarantee citations or rankings.

Not measured: Question-style headingsNo H2 or H3 headings on the sampled pages, so there is nothing to assess.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No H2 or H3 headings on the sampled pages, so there is nothing to assess.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Break the page into sections with H2/H3 headings. Phrase the ones that answer something as the question a reader would type.

Not measured: Answers lead the sectionNo <p> paragraphs were found on the homepage.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No <p> paragraphs were found on the homepage.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Put the page's body copy in paragraph elements. This check then looks at whether the opening answers the question instead of warming up.

Not measured: Content is chunkableNo <p> paragraphs were found on the sampled pages.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No <p> paragraphs were found on the sampled pages.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Put the body copy in paragraphs, lists or tables. This check then measures whether the blocks are short enough to be quoted on their own.

Not measured: Definitional openingNo opening paragraph was found on the homepage.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No opening paragraph was found on the homepage.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Open the page with a sentence that says what the thing is. This check then confirms the first paragraph is definitional.

Not measured: Citable facts densityVery few concrete figures in the text (0 numbers in 0 words).

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

Very few concrete figures in the text (0 numbers in 0 words).

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Specific numbers, dates and stats are what AI answers cite. 'Fast' is ignorable; '2.3× faster' is quotable.

Not measured: Description reads as a liftable summaryDescription is short or non-declarative: "Interactive world exploration with Atlas.…"

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

Description is short or non-declarative: "Interactive world exploration with Atlas.…"

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Prefer a complete declarative sentence over slogans or questions — it should stand alone when quoted out of context.

Not measured: Question headings have concise answersNo question-shaped H2/H3 headings were available to pair with answer paragraphs.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No question-shaped H2/H3 headings were available to pair with answer paragraphs.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Write the questions your audience asks as H2/H3 headings, then answer each in a concise paragraph immediately below it.

Not measured: Machine-readable provenance signalsNo machine-readable author, date, breadcrumb, or contact signal was found on sampled pages.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No machine-readable author, date, breadcrumb, or contact signal was found on sampled pages.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add provenance signals in JSON-LD and visible HTML: author, publication/update date, breadcrumbs, and a reachable contact method.

Not measured: llms.txt follows the specNo readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish llms.txt first — the llms.txt check covers that — then this one verifies the structure.

Reference
Not applicable: Accept: text/markdown negotiationThe homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Optional: return a stripped markdown body when the request asks for text/markdown. Some hosts and CDNs do this for you; a plain HTML answer is not a defect.

Not applicable: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectableNo OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

An API is optional. Add a service-desc link if you already publish a machine-readable API specification.

Looks good: AI crawler access

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Consistent brand entity

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Brand declared: og:site_name "Frameboy".

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Entity identity agrees across signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The site is consistently named "Frameboy" and 2 identity URL(s) stay on frameboy.worldlabs.ai.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AdSense readinessOptional

12/100

Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.

On its own, this site scores 16/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.

Needs a fix: Privacy policy pageNo privacy policy page is linked or crawlable.

Needs a fix · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

No privacy policy page is linked or crawlable.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Publish an accessible privacy policy that discloses cookies and data use by Google and other third-party ad vendors.

Reference
Needs a fix: Sampled publisher-content coverage1/1 editorial pages expose fewer than 80 publisher words in source HTML.

Needs a fix · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

1/1 editorial pages expose fewer than 80 publisher words in source HTML.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Add crawlable explanation or original publisher material to those pages. Most of the sample currently reads as chrome rather than content.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/
Reference
Could be better: Publisher content exists in source HTML1 sampled page(s) expose an empty application root and fewer than 30 publisher words in source HTML.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

1 sampled page(s) expose an empty application root and fewer than 30 publisher words in source HTML.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Server-render or statically render primary content so AdsBot and other crawlers receive meaningful publisher content without relying on client execution.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/
Reference
Could be better: Terms pageNo terms of use page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No terms of use page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Consider adding terms that identify the service rules and publisher. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense requirement.

Could be better: About pageNo about page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No about page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an About page that identifies the publisher, site purpose, and relevant experience. This supports content transparency but is not a standalone AdSense requirement.

Could be better: Contact methodNo contact page or mailto link found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No contact page or mailto link found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add a working contact route or visible email so users can reach the publisher. This is a trust heuristic, not a published approval rule.

Could be better: Thin page share1/1 editorial pages expose fewer than 80 publisher words.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/1 editorial pages expose fewer than 80 publisher words.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Review these pages for a clear purpose and useful publisher material. This cutoff is a triage heuristic, not an AdSense minimum.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/ (0 publisher words)
Could be better: Tool pages expose explanatory content1/1 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/1 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words. Google publishes no minimum word count; this is an audit heuristic.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Explain the tool's purpose, inputs, method, limitations, and result interpretation in source HTML. Add useful material, not filler.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/
Reference
Could be better: Clear navigationOnly 0 link(s) inside <nav>/<header> and 0 recognizable primary navigation destination(s).

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 0 link(s) inside <nav>/<header> and 0 recognizable primary navigation destination(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add crawlable navigation that lets users reach the site's main publisher content and policy pages.

Reference
Not measured: Privacy policy advertising disclosuresA privacy page was not present in the crawl sample, so its disclosures could not be verified.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

A privacy page was not present in the crawl sample, so its disclosures could not be verified.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Confirm the policy explains cookies or similar storage, Google or advertising vendors, and third-party data use.

Reference
Not measured: First-party contact emailNo public contact email was found in the sampled home, About, or Contact pages.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No public contact email was found in the sampled home, About, or Contact pages.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

A public email is optional. The separate contact-method check covers whether readers have a way to reach the publisher.

Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No ads.txt yet.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.

Reference
Not applicable: Article-style content existsNo article/blog-style pages detected among crawled pages.

Not applicable · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No article/blog-style pages detected among crawled pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

No action is required solely because articles are absent. For tool or directory sites, make the unique publisher value and explanation crawlable on each relevant screen.

Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.

Reference
Not measured: Author bylines on contentNo editorial pages were identified in the crawl sample.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No editorial pages were identified in the crawl sample.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Tool and application pages do not need article bylines. Identify the publisher through the site and About page instead.

Not measured: Author or publisher backgroundNo editorial pages were identified, so author-background links were not expected.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No editorial pages were identified, so author-background links were not expected.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

For non-editorial sites, use the About page and publisher identity signals instead.

Not measured: Latest article has real depthNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reads the newest one.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article reads as edited workNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reviews its style signals.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article names an author and a dateNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then looks for its byline and date.

Reference
Looks good: No ads on non-content screens

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Show 4 more checks
Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No high publisher-content repetition among 0 substantial sampled page(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No "coming soon", "under construction" or lorem-ipsum text on crawled pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language "en" is AdSense-supported.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Existing ad scripts

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No competing ad scripts on the page.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Hosting and infrastructure

Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.

Hosting and infrastructure observations
Hostnameframeboy.worldlabs.ai
HostingVercel
IP addresses216.150.1.1, 216.150.16.1
DNS A216.150.16.1 · 216.150.1.1
DNS CNAME8ebbf006d0aef7a0.vercel-dns-016.com
DNS CAA{"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"globalsign.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"letsencrypt.org"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"pki.goog"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"sectigo.com"}
TLSTLSv1.3TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
Certificate issuerLet's Encrypt / YR2
Certificate valid untilJan 31 15:19:10 2027 GMT
Certificate validationPassed

Website anatomy and diagnostics

Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.

Page architecture

Choose a page to explore its details and connections.

Page content

0 publisher words

Page structure

javascript shell

Observed discovery

Depth 0 · 0 incoming links

HTTP 200 · 2.0 KB source

Source interactions

0 controls · 0 unnamed

1 script / 1 stylesheet references

Canonical declaration
https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/
Schema types
None observed
Outgoing links in sampled graph
None observed

Routes: /

Resource origins 1

Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.

  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/script, stylesheet · 2 references · same origin
Crawler policy by page

Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.

Robots policy for every evaluated crawler and sampled page
Crawler / purposePagePolicyMatched directive
Googlebotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
bingbotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
OAI-SearchBotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
PerplexityBotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Claude-SearchBotsearch/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
GPTBottraining/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ClaudeBottraining/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/allowedDeclared policy for this page.
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces

No supported machine interfaces were advertised in the sampled HTML. An API or MCP server is optional; undiscovered interfaces remain unknown.

Public DNS and TLS endpoint

frameboy.worldlabs.ai · observed · 216.150.1.1, 216.150.16.1

A
216.150.16.1 · 216.150.1.1
AAAA
Unavailable for this exact hostname
CNAME
8ebbf006d0aef7a0.vercel-dns-016.com
NS
Unavailable for this exact hostname
MX
Unavailable for this exact hostname
CAA
{"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"globalsign.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"letsencrypt.org"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"pki.goog"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"sectigo.com"}

TLS: TLSv1.3

Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.

Issuer: Let's Encrypt / YR2

Certificate valid until: Jan 31 15:19:10 2027 GMT

PageSpeed measurement

Loading the PageSpeed panel…

Growth resources

Loading growth resources…

Where to take this site next

Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.

  1. 01

    Fix the fundamentals first

    Your top fixes list is the priority order — clear the red items before creating more content.

  2. 02

    Re-run the combined audit after each batch of fixes

    Re-run after fixes to see which checks changed; score bands are guidance, not a guarantee of ranking, traffic, or approval.

  3. 03

    Fix AdSense policy signals

    Make policy pages, publisher disclosures and substantial content reachable before applying. This audit cannot predict approval.

Apply the recommended fixes

Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.

Open in ChatGPT Open in Grok Open in Perplexity

Report notes

  • 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
  • 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
  • 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
  • https://frameboy.worldlabs.ai/