Website report

Visit sitehttps://getseam.app/

Turn your MacBook Pro notch into a control center. Focus timer, music controls, calendar, voice-to-text, battery, and more. Native Mac app. One-time $19.90.

Audit Full discovery audit·Language English (en)·Response HTTP 200·Served by Cloudflare

Analysed Nov 8, 2026 · 15 categories · 113 passed · 21 warnings · 2 issues · 14 informational

Audit score

F

50/100

Needs work

Agentic
79
SEO
56

What we found

2Needs a fix21Could be better113Looks good14Informational
  1. 1.Needs a fix: Internal links resolve: needs fixing. see checkWorking, descriptive links help people find the right page.
  2. 2.Needs a fix: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectable: needs fixing. see checkClear, accessible information helps AI assistants understand and cite your website.
  3. 3.Could be better: Share image dimensions declared: needs attention. see checkComplete link previews make your pages easier to recognize and share.
  4. 4.Could be better: Images are missing size information. see checkDeclared dimensions keep content from jumping while images load.
  5. 5.Could be better: Your images use older file formats. see checkEfficient image formats reduce download size.

Built with 2 technologies· detected stack

Read from the public source and response headers of the sampled pages.

How it fits together

  • SvelteKitFramework
  • CloudflareCDN / edge
InfrastructureType
  • CloudflareCDN / edge
Frameworks and librariesType
  • SvelteKitFramework

A framework or CDN signal describes the public response, not the origin host or private backend.

Site checks

113 passed · 21 warnings · 2 issues

Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.

Metadata11Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Page title exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title found: "Dynamic Island for Mac | seam: Timer, Music, Voice, Calendar"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title is 60 characters, inside this audit's 15–60 review range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title says what the site does

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title "Dynamic Island for Mac | seam: Timer, Music, Voice, Calendar" says more than the site name.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description found: "Turn your MacBook Pro notch into a control center. Focus timer, music controls, calendar, …"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Description is 156 characters and inside this audit's 70–160 preview range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Titles unique across pages

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 5 indexable sampled pages have distinct titles.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Character encoding declared

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

UTF-8 declared in a meta tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTML5 doctype

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HTML5 doctype declared.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta keywords tag

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No obsolete meta keywords tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Indexing16Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Single canonical declaration

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

One canonical declaration found.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No meta-refresh redirect.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No soft-404 response

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical target integrity

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Indexability signals align across 10 sampled URL(s).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 10 more checks
Looks good: robots.txt exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt responds with 200.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. Most specific matching path; allow wins equal-length conflicts.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap found at https://getseam.app/sitemap.xml.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap parses and lists URLs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap lists 169 same-origin URLs.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap declared in robots.txt

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt declares the sitemap.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical URL set

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical set: https://getseam.app/

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is absolute and points at this page.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: www vs apex consistency

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Hostname is used consistently (getseam.app).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: URLs are readable slugs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

URL slugs are readable (25 sampled).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No restrictive search-access signal on 10 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Content2Could be better8Looks good1Informational

100/100
Could be better: Text-to-HTML ratioVisible text is 1.7% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Visible text is 1.7% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Text-to-HTML ratio is not a ranking factor, but a very low value often means deeply nested markup or content that only appears after JavaScript runs. Check the source-content checks before changing anything.

Could be better: Title and H1 agreeTitle ("Dynamic Island for Mac | seam: Timer, Music, Voice…") and H1 ("Save an hour every day from the top of your screen…") share no significant words.

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title ("Dynamic Island for Mac | seam: Timer, Music, Voice…") and H1 ("Save an hour every day from the top of your screen…") share no significant words.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Align them around the same core topic — mixed signals confuse both rankers and readers.

Not measured: ReadabilityFlesch reading ease ≈ 61.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Flesch reading ease ≈ 61.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

60+ reads easily for most visitors. This is a heuristic, not a rule — technical audiences tolerate denser text.

Looks good: Crawlable content in source HTML

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No recognized empty JavaScript application shell on 10 sampled page(s). The entered page exposes 593 publisher word(s).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Homepage content volume

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited page has about 593 words of main content.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No placeholder text

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: No starter-template leftovers

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No starter-template artifacts detected.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicates

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No near-duplicate main content among 5 indexable sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No deprecated HTML tags

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No deprecated HTML tags.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Outbound references

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

13 outbound link(s) present.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pages

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No repeated description, H1, or publisher copy across 5 sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Social sharing1Could be better7Looks good

92/100
Could be better: Share image dimensions declaredog:image:width / og:image:height are missing.

Could be better · Social sharing · Review suggested

Observed evidence

og:image:width / og:image:height are missing.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Declare them (1200×630 recommended) so platforms render the preview immediately on first share instead of after re-scraping.

Looks good: Open Graph title

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:title: "Dynamic Island for Mac | seam: Timer, Music, Voice, Calendar"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph description

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:description: "Turn your MacBook Pro notch into a control center. Focus timer, music controls, calendar, …"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph image

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image is set: "https://getseam.app/og/home.png"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image loads

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image returns 200 (image/png).

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:url and og:type

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:url and og:type ("website") are set.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Twitter/X card

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

twitter:card is "summary_large_image".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:site_name

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:site_name: "Seam".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Structured data4Looks good1Informational

100/100
Not measured: Breadcrumb schema on inner pagesNone of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Not measured · Structured data · Not established

Observed evidence

None of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add BreadcrumbList to inner pages — Google shows breadcrumbs in results and it clarifies site structure.

Affected pages (9)

  • https://getseam.app/privacy
  • https://getseam.app/cdn-cgi/content
  • https://getseam.app/download
  • https://getseam.app/faqs
  • https://getseam.app/buy
  • https://getseam.app/changelog
  • https://getseam.app/fr
  • https://getseam.app/de
  • https://getseam.app/ja
Reference
Looks good: JSON-LD present

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 JSON-LD block(s) found on the homepage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: JSON-LD parses

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 6 JSON-LD block(s) parse cleanly.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Organization or WebSite schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Identity schema present: Organization.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content-specific schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Content schema found: Offer, FAQPage, SoftwareApplication.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Headings7Looks good

100/100
Looks good: H1 exists

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 found: "Save an hour every day from the top of your screen."

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Single H1

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Exactly one H1 on the homepage.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Heading levels don't skip

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Heading hierarchy is sequential across 11 headings.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: H1 has real text

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 reads "Save an hour every day from the top of your screen.".

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Headings are descriptive

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

11 headings, averaging 3.9 words — descriptive.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is sectioned with H2s

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

7 H2 section(s) structure the page.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Element IDs are unique per document

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All inspected element IDs are unique within their documents.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Images2Could be better2Looks good

69/100
Could be better: Width/height attributes15 of 28 visible images lack width and height attributes: wallpaper-960.avif, wallpaper-1920.avif, finder.png, ….

Could be better · Images · Review suggested

Observed evidence

15 of 28 visible images lack width and height attributes: wallpaper-960.avif, wallpaper-1920.avif, finder.png, ….

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Set explicit width and height so the browser reserves the space before the image loads. Without them the page shifts as images arrive, which is what Cumulative Layout Shift measures. next/image sets them for you.

Reference
Could be better: Modern image formats26 of 28 raster images are served only as PNG or JPEG: app-icon-256.png, finder.png, safari.png, ….

Could be better · Images · Review suggested

Observed evidence

26 of 28 raster images are served only as PNG or JPEG: app-icon-256.png, finder.png, safari.png, ….

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Serve WebP or AVIF versions, which are usually 25–50% smaller at the same quality. Use <picture> with a WebP/AVIF <source> and the original as fallback, or an image CDN or framework image component that converts automatically.

Reference
Looks good: Alt text coverage

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 28 visible images declare alt attributes (including empty alt for decorative images). Whether each description fits its image needs a human look.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Lazy loading

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

20/28 images are lazy-loaded.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Mobile4Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not measured: No tiny inline font sizesNo sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Not measured · Mobile · Not established

Observed evidence

No sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Check computed font sizes in a browser across mobile widths.

Not applicable: ARIA references point to source elementsNo ARIA ID references found in the sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No ARIA ID references found in the sampled HTML.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Verify rendered accessibility separately.

Looks good: Viewport meta tag

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Viewport configured: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1".

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The viewport lets users zoom.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Responsive image markup

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1/28 images ship responsive srcset variants.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Interactive controls have source labels

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

355 source controls have detectable names. Browser accessibility and CSS visibility were not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Language3Looks good

100/100
Looks good: html lang attribute

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language declared: lang="en".

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: hreflang syntax

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

5 syntactically valid hreflang tags including x-default. Reciprocal links and target content were not verified.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Declared language matches content

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Declared language (en) matches detected content language.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Branding2Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not measured: Apple touch iconNo apple-touch-icon link.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No apple-touch-icon link.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add a 180×180 apple-touch-icon so iOS home-screen bookmarks show your logo instead of a screenshot.

Not measured: Web app manifestNo web manifest linked.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No web manifest linked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional, but a manifest.json enables install prompts and better mobile integration.

Looks good: Favicon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (/app-icon-256.png).

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Theme color

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

theme-color is "#0A0A0A".

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Performance

100/100

Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.

Performance measurements observed during the audit
MeasureThis siteReading
Web fonts don't block text—Informational: not applicableNo Google Fonts stylesheet links detected.
Server response time652 msLooks good: goodThe audit received response headers after 652 ms from one test location.
HTML payload size225 KBLooks good: goodThe page's HTML is 225 KB uncompressed: acceptable, though under 100 KB is a good target for content pages.
No render-blocking head scripts—Looks good: goodNo synchronous render-blocking scripts in <head>.
Inline styles are bounded0.0 KBLooks good: goodInline styles total 0.0 KB.
Script/stylesheet count—Looks good: good7 total script/style resources — reasonable.
HTML served compressed—Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br.
Iframe usage—Looks good: goodNo iframes.
Source HTML weight224.9 KBInformational: measured source, not transferred bytes224.9 KB of HTML on the audited page

From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.

Security

93/100

HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.

Could be better: Frame embedding protectionNo frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Send Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' (or 'none', or a list of partner origins), or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN. It stops other sites from framing your pages to trick visitors into clicking (clickjacking).

Reference
Could be better: Content Security PolicyNo Content-Security-Policy detected.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Content-Security-Policy detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Configure an enforced policy for script and resource origins; use report-only monitoring to prepare changes safely.

Reference
Could be better: Browser feature permissionsNo explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Disable unused camera, microphone, or geolocation access using Permissions-Policy.

Not applicable: Declared form submission targetsNo HTML forms were found.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No HTML forms were found.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Check JavaScript-generated form transport separately if present.

Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Review authentication forms separately when applicable.

Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Site serves over HTTPS.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTTP redirects to HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

http:// permanently redirects to https://./

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HSTS header

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HSTS is set: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Referrer policy

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No Referrer-Policy is set, so browsers apply their default, strict-origin-when-cross-origin, which sends only the origin to other sites.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: X-Content-Type-Options

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

nosniff is set.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No mixed content

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No insecure subresources detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Server technology disclosure

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No X-Powered-By disclosure.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AI answer readiness

63/100

Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.

Needs a fix: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectable1 declared API specification(s) were invalid or unreachable: The JSON is not a recognizable OpenAPI/Swagger document with info and paths.

Needs a fix · AI answer readiness · Measured on your pageCritical

Observed evidence

1 declared API specification(s) were invalid or unreachable: The JSON is not a recognizable OpenAPI/Swagger document with info and paths.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Fix each advertised specification URL, return a real document and publish complete OpenAPI metadata and paths. No API operation was invoked.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://getseam.app/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json
Could be better: Question-style headingsOnly 0% of 498 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 0% of 498 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Phrase key subheadings as the questions users actually ask ("How much does X cost?"). This improves the measured question-heading signal; the audit does not guarantee citations.

Could be better: Definitional openingThe opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Type 4x faster with your voice…"

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Type 4x faster with your voice…"

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

"X is a Y that does Z for W" in the first paragraph gives answer engines a liftable definition of you. Write it once, benefit everywhere.

Could be better: Freshness signalsNo dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

For content where dates matter, show the actual update date and mirror it in dateModified. Do not invent dates or change them without a substantive update. Missing dates alone do not prove stale content.

Could be better: Machine-readable provenance signalsOnly 2 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, contact.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Only 2 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, contact.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add the missing author, date, breadcrumb, or contact signal so machines can identify provenance and site structure.

Affected pages (9)

  • https://getseam.app/
  • https://getseam.app/privacy
  • https://getseam.app/download
  • https://getseam.app/faqs
  • https://getseam.app/buy
  • https://getseam.app/changelog
  • https://getseam.app/fr
  • https://getseam.app/de
  • https://getseam.app/ja
Could be better: Accept: text/markdown negotiationThe server returns markdown for Accept: text/markdown but does not declare Vary: Accept.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The server returns markdown for Accept: text/markdown but does not declare Vary: Accept.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add Vary: Accept (or an equivalent cache-key configuration) so shared caches keep HTML and markdown representations separate.

Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No /llms-full.txt.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.

Reference
Not measured: Authored, dated articlesNo Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add Article schema with author and datePublished so the page exposes clear provenance for retrieval. This audit does not measure or guarantee citations or rankings.

Not measured: Citable facts density33 concrete figures across 630 words.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

33 concrete figures across 630 words.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Good — keep facts specific and current, and date-stamp them.

Looks good: llms.txt

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

llms.txt exists (3375 chars of markdown).

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: AI crawler access

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: FAQ/QA schema

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

FAQ/QA schema found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Semantic HTML structure

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Semantic structure present: main×1, section×14, nav×4, header×1, footer×1.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Answers lead the section

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs get to the point without preamble.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is chunkable

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs average 20 words, lists present — chunk-friendly.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Cites external sources

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

78 outbound reference(s) across crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Consistent brand entity

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Brand declared: og:site_name "Seam" + identity schema.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Description reads as a liftable summary

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description works as a standalone summary.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Entity identity agrees across signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The site is consistently named "Seam" and 3 identity URL(s) stay on getseam.app.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Question headings have concise answers

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 concise answer block(s) follow 1 question-shaped heading(s).

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: llms.txt follows the spec

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

llms.txt has an H1, a summary, 4 section(s) and 32 link(s).

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Markdown copies of pages

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

3 of 3 probed URLs returned markdown.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AdSense readinessOptional

31/100

Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.

On its own, this site scores 28/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.

Could be better: Privacy policy advertising disclosuresFetched privacy policy lacks cookie/storage, third-party/vendor disclosure signals.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Published platform ruleCritical

Observed evidence

Fetched privacy policy lacks cookie/storage, third-party/vendor disclosure signals.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Describe data collection, sharing, and cookie use by Google and other third-party ad vendors.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://getseam.app/privacy
Reference
Could be better: Sampled publisher-content coverage2/9 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 9 pages hold 12551 publisher words in total.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

2/9 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 9 pages hold 12551 publisher words in total. 1 of the 10 sampled pages is a support or tool page and was excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Review whether each page fully serves its purpose. Expand incomplete editorial content with useful information; keep concise navigation and tool pages when they help visitors.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://getseam.app/download
  • https://getseam.app/buy
Reference
Could be better: Latest article has real depthThe newest article has 468 words of body text.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Measured on your pageCritical

Observed evidence

The newest article has 468 words of body text.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Check that the page covers the question end to end. Short is fine when the topic is small; it reads as thin when the title promises a guide.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://getseam.app/fr/blog
Reference
Could be better: About pageNo about page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No about page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an About page that identifies the publisher, site purpose, and relevant experience. This supports content transparency but is not a standalone AdSense requirement.

Could be better: Tool pages expose explanatory content1/6 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/6 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words. Google publishes no minimum word count; this is an audit heuristic.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Explain the tool's purpose, inputs, method, limitations, and result interpretation in source HTML. Add useful material, not filler.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://getseam.app/download
Reference
Could be better: Author or publisher background1/1 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/1 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Link the byline to an author profile or About page, or add truthful structured author details. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense approval rule.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://getseam.app/changelog
Reference
Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No ads.txt yet.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.

Reference
Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.

Reference
Looks good: Privacy policy page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Privacy policy found: https://getseam.app/privacy

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Terms page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Terms page found: /terms

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Contact method

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Contact email found: mailto:hello@getseam.app

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: First-party contact email

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

First-party contact email found: hello@getseam.app.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Thin page share

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

7/9 editorial pages clear the audit's publisher-content triage threshold. 1 of the 10 sampled pages is a support or tool page and was excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No ads on non-content screens

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No high publisher-content repetition among 7 substantial sampled page(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content exists in source HTML

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No empty client-rendered publisher shell in the crawl sample.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Clear navigation

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Navigation present with 11 links.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Article-style content exists

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Article-style content detected.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No "coming soon", "under construction" or lorem-ipsum text on crawled pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language "en" is AdSense-supported.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 4 more checks
Looks good: Existing ad scripts

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No competing ad scripts on the page.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Author bylines on content

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Author attribution appears on all 1 sampled editorial pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change.

Reference
Looks good: Latest article reads as edited work

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Style pattern score 12/100 on the newest article. These are style patterns in the sampled text, not a determination of how the page was written.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Latest article names an author and a date

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The newest article shows both an author and a date.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Hosting and infrastructure

Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.

Hosting and infrastructure observations
Hostnamegetseam.app
CDN / edgeCloudflare
IP addresses104.21.62.61, 172.67.220.165, 2606:4700:3037::ac43:dca5, 2606:4700:3033::6815:3e3d
DNS A104.21.62.61 · 172.67.220.165
DNS AAAA2606:4700:3033::6815:3e3d · 2606:4700:3037::ac43:dca5
DNS NSdecker.ns.cloudflare.com · ollie.ns.cloudflare.com
DNS MX1 aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
DNS CAA{"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"comodoca.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"letsencrypt.org"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"ssl.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"comodoca.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"letsencrypt.org"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"ssl.com"}
TLSTLSv1.3TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Certificate issuerGoogle Trust Services / WE1
Certificate valid untilJan 25 13:44:52 2027 GMT
Certificate validationPassed

Website anatomy and diagnostics

Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.

Page architecture

Choose a page to explore its details and connections.

Page content

593 publisher words

Page structure

html content

Observed discovery

Depth 0 · 7 incoming links

HTTP 200 · 224.9 KB source

Source interactions

65 controls · 0 unnamed

2 script / 5 stylesheet references

Canonical declaration
https://getseam.app/
Schema types
SoftwareApplication, Offer, Organization
Outgoing links in sampled graph
/cdn-cgi/content · /download · /faqs · /buy · /changelog · /fr · /de · /ja · /features · /blog · /story · /privacy · /terms · /recover

Routes: / · /privacy · /cdn-cgi · /download · /faqs · /buy · /changelog · /fr · /de · /ja

Resource origins 3

Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.

  • https://getseam.app/stylesheet, image · 168 references · same origin
  • https://umami.upsys-consulting.com/script · 9 references · cross origin
  • https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/script · 9 references · cross origin
Crawler policy by page

Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.

Robots policy for every evaluated crawler and sampled page
Crawler / purposePagePolicyMatched directive
Googlebotsearch/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/downloadallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/faqsallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/buyallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/changelogallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/frallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/deallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/jaallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/downloadallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/faqsallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/buyallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/changelogallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/frallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/deallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/jaallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/downloadallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/faqsallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/buyallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/changelogallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/frallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/deallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/jaallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/downloadallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/faqsallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/buyallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/changelogallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/frallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/deallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/jaallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/downloadallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/faqsallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/buyallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/changelogallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/frallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/deallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/jaallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/privacyallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/downloadallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/faqsallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/buyallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/changelogallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/frallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/deallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/jaallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/privacyallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/downloadallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/faqsallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/buyallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/changelogallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/frallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/deallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/jaallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/privacyallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/downloadallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/faqsallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/buyallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/changelogallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/frallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/deallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/jaallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/privacyallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/cdn-cgi/contentallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/downloadallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/faqsallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/buyallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/changelogallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/frallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/deallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/jaallowedallow: /
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces
  • openapi · invalid

    https://getseam.app/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json

    The advertised document was unavailable or invalid.

Public DNS and TLS endpoint

getseam.app · observed · 104.21.62.61, 172.67.220.165, 2606:4700:3037::ac43:dca5, 2606:4700:3033::6815:3e3d

A
104.21.62.61 · 172.67.220.165
AAAA
2606:4700:3033::6815:3e3d · 2606:4700:3037::ac43:dca5
CNAME
Unavailable for this exact hostname
NS
decker.ns.cloudflare.com · ollie.ns.cloudflare.com
MX
1 aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
CAA
{"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"comodoca.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"letsencrypt.org"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issue":"ssl.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"comodoca.com"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"letsencrypt.org"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"} · {"critical":0,"type":"CAA","issuewild":"ssl.com"}

TLS: TLSv1.3

Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.

Issuer: Google Trust Services / WE1

Certificate valid until: Jan 25 13:44:52 2027 GMT

PageSpeed measurement

Loading the PageSpeed panel…

Growth resources

Loading growth resources…

Where to take this site next

Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.

  1. 01

    Fix the fundamentals first

    Your top fixes list is the priority order — clear the red items before creating more content.

  2. 02

    Re-run the combined audit after each batch of fixes

    Re-run after fixes to see which checks changed; score bands are guidance, not a guarantee of ranking, traffic, or approval.

Apply the recommended fixes

Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.

Open in ChatGPT Open in Grok Open in Perplexity

Report notes

  • 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
  • 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
  • 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
  • https://getseam.app/
  • https://getseam.app/privacy
  • https://getseam.app/cdn-cgi/content
  • https://getseam.app/download
  • https://getseam.app/faqs
  • https://getseam.app/buy
  • https://getseam.app/changelog
  • https://getseam.app/fr
  • https://getseam.app/de
  • https://getseam.app/ja