Website report
Visit sitehttps://livingbrain.com/
A persistent and evolving intelligence layer that connects your context, surfaces non-obvious connections, and gives every agent shared memory, context and continuity.
Audit Full discovery audit·Language English (en)·Response HTTP 200·Served by Cloudflare
Analysed Nov 7, 2026 · 15 categories · 94 passed · 26 warnings · 1 issue · 29 informational
Partial evidence; some observations were unavailable.
Audit score
D59/100
Mixed
- Agentic
- 83
- SEO
- 59
What we found
1Needs a fix26Could be better94Looks good29Informational- 1.Needs a fix: H1 has real text: needs fixing. see checkClear headings make your content easier to scan and navigate.
- 2.Could be better: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pages: needs attention. see checkUseful, specific content gives visitors answers and a reason to stay.
- 3.Could be better: Your site has no sitemap. see checkA sitemap helps search engines discover your pages.
- 4.Could be better: Interactive controls have source labels: needs attention. see checkA usable mobile layout helps visitors read and act on your content.
- 5.Could be better: Your title only names the brand. see checkPeople need to know what you offer before they click.
Built with 2 technologies· detected stack
Read from the public source and response headers of the sampled pages.
How it fits together
Next.jsFramework
CloudflareCDN / edge
CloudflareCDN / edge
Next.jsFramework
A framework or CDN signal describes the public response, not the origin host or private backend.
Site checks
Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.
Metadata4Could be better7Looks good
95/100Could be better: Title says what the site doesTitle is only the site name: "Living Brain".
Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested
Observed evidence
Title is only the site name: "Living Brain".
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Add a short descriptor after the name, for example "Brand — what it does for whom". People who do not know the name yet search for what you do.
Could be better: Title lengthTitle "Living Brain" is 12 characters, under this audit's 15-character review point (a heuristic, not a Google minimum).
Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested
Observed evidence
Title "Living Brain" is 12 characters, under this audit's 15-character review point (a heuristic, not a Google minimum).
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Make the title descriptive enough to identify the page topic and purpose without padding it to a target count.
Could be better: Meta description lengthDescription is 167 characters, over this audit's 160-character review point (a preview heuristic, not a Google limit).
Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested
Observed evidence
Description is 167 characters, over this audit's 160-character review point (a preview heuristic, not a Google limit).
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Front-load the useful summary because Google may generate or truncate snippets by query and device.
Could be better: No meta keywords tagA meta keywords tag is present ("Living Brain,AI Memory,Living Memory,Persistent Memory,AI Br…").
Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested
Observed evidence
A meta keywords tag is present ("Living Brain,AI Memory,Living Memory,Persistent Memory,AI Br…").
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
You can remove it. Google has ignored meta keywords since 2009, so the tag does nothing for search and shows competitors the terms you target.
Looks good: Page title exists
Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Title found: "Living Brain"
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Meta description exists
Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Meta description found: "A persistent and evolving intelligence layer that connects your context, surfaces non-obvi…"
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Titles unique across pages
Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
All 7 indexable sampled pages have distinct titles.
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed
Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Character encoding declared
Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
UTF-8 declared in the Content-Type header and a meta tag.
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: HTML5 doctype
Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
HTML5 doctype declared.
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>
Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.
Why this matters
The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Indexing1Could be better12Looks good3Informational
80/100Could be better: Sitemap existsNo sitemap found (checked https://livingbrain.com/sitemap.xml → 404).
Could be better · Indexing · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No sitemap found (checked https://livingbrain.com/sitemap.xml → 404).
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Publish a sitemap.xml and submit it in Google Search Console. Next.js: export from app/sitemap.ts — it's ~10 lines.
Not applicable: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signalsNo sitemap was found, so there are no submitted URLs to compare against.
Not applicable · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No sitemap was found, so there are no submitted URLs to compare against.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
The sitemap check covers the missing file. Once one exists, this check confirms the URLs it lists are indexable.
Not measured: Sitemap parses and lists URLsNo sitemap was reachable, so its contents cannot be validated.
Not measured · Indexing · Not established
Observed evidence
No sitemap was reachable, so its contents cannot be validated.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Publish /sitemap.xml with your canonical URLs. This check then validates the XML and the URLs it lists.
Not applicable: Sitemap declared in robots.txtNo sitemap was reachable, so robots.txt has nothing to point at.
Not applicable · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No sitemap was reachable, so robots.txt has nothing to point at.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
Publish the sitemap first, then add a Sitemap: line to robots.txt naming its absolute URL.
Looks good: Single canonical declaration
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
One canonical declaration found.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Show 10 more checks
Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No meta-refresh redirect.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: No soft-404 response
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Canonical target integrity
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: robots.txt exists
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
robots.txt responds with 200.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. Most specific matching path; allow wins equal-length conflicts.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Canonical URL set
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Canonical set: https://livingbrain.com/
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Canonical is absolute and points at this page.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: www vs apex consistency
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Hostname is used consistently (livingbrain.com).
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: URLs are readable slugs
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
URL slugs are readable (7 sampled).
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals
Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No restrictive search-access signal on 8 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.
Why this matters
These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Content2Could be better7Looks good2Informational
84/100Could be better: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pagesRepeated discovery copy found: description "A persistent and evolving intelligence layer that connects your context, surface…" on https://livingbrain.com/ and https://livingbrain.com/about-us and https://livingbrain.com/privacy-policy and https://livingbrain.com/pricing and https://livingbrain.com/workspace and https://livingbrain.com/terms-of-service.
Could be better · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Repeated discovery copy found: description "A persistent and evolving intelligence layer that connects your context, surface…" on https://livingbrain.com/ and https://livingbrain.com/about-us and https://livingbrain.com/privacy-policy and https://livingbrain.com/pricing and https://livingbrain.com/workspace and https://livingbrain.com/terms-of-service.
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Give each content page a distinct description, H1, and opening copy. If the pages intentionally represent one resource, consolidate them with a canonical or redirect.
Affected pages (6)
- https://livingbrain.com/
- https://livingbrain.com/about-us
- https://livingbrain.com/privacy-policy
- https://livingbrain.com/pricing
- https://livingbrain.com/workspace
- https://livingbrain.com/terms-of-service
Could be better: Text-to-HTML ratioVisible text is 2.2% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).
Could be better · Content · Review suggested
Observed evidence
Visible text is 2.2% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Text-to-HTML ratio is not a ranking factor, but a very low value often means deeply nested markup or content that only appears after JavaScript runs. Check the source-content checks before changing anything.
Not measured: ReadabilityFlesch reading ease ≈ 31.
Not measured · Content · Not established
Observed evidence
Flesch reading ease ≈ 31.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
60+ reads easily for most visitors. This is a heuristic, not a rule — technical audiences tolerate denser text.
Not applicable: Title and H1 agreeNeed both a <title> and an H1 to compare them.
Not applicable · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Need both a <title> and an H1 to compare them.
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
Add whichever is missing — the metadata and headings checks name it — then this check confirms the two describe the same topic.
Looks good: Crawlable content in source HTML
Looks good · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No recognized empty JavaScript application shell on 8 sampled page(s). The entered page exposes 721 publisher word(s).
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Homepage content volume
Looks good · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
The audited page has about 721 words of main content.
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Show 5 more checks
Looks good: No placeholder text
Looks good · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: No starter-template leftovers
Looks good · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No starter-template artifacts detected.
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicates
Looks good · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No near-duplicate main content among 7 indexable sampled pages.
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Outbound references
Looks good · Content · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
17 outbound link(s) present.
Why this matters
This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Structured dataNot measured
Not measuredCould be better: JSON-LD presentNo JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.
Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No JSON-LD structured data on the homepage.
Why this matters
Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Add Organization and WebSite schema. They state who publishes the site and what it is called, which is what rich results and answer engines read first.
Could be better: Organization or WebSite schemaNo Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.
Could be better · Structured data · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No Organization, WebSite or Person schema found.
Why this matters
Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Add an identity node so search engines and AI assistants can attribute your content to a real entity.
Not applicable: JSON-LD parsesNo JSON-LD blocks were found, so there is no syntax to validate.
Not applicable · Structured data · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No JSON-LD blocks were found, so there is no syntax to validate.
Why this matters
Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
Add a <script type="application/ld+json"> block describing the page — Organization or WebSite is the usual starting point.
Not applicable: Content-specific schemaNo content-specific schema (Article, Product, FAQPage…) detected.
Not applicable · Structured data · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No content-specific schema (Article, Product, FAQPage…) detected.
Why this matters
Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
If you publish articles, products or FAQs, add the matching schema type — that's what makes rich results (stars, FAQs, prices) possible.
Headings1Needs a fix6Looks good
87/100Needs a fix: H1 has real textThe H1 has no text, alt text or label (often a logo image with an empty alt).
Needs a fix · Headings · Review suggested
Observed evidence
The H1 has no text, alt text or label (often a logo image with an empty alt).
Why this matters
Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.
Recommended fix
Put descriptive text in the H1. If it wraps a logo, give the image alt text naming the site, or move the H1 to the hero headline.
Looks good: H1 exists
Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
H1 found: ""
Why this matters
Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Single H1
Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Exactly one H1 on the homepage.
Why this matters
Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Heading levels don't skip
Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Heading hierarchy is sequential across 35 headings.
Why this matters
Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Headings are descriptive
Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
35 headings, averaging 2.3 words — descriptive.
Why this matters
Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Content is sectioned with H2s
Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
12 H2 section(s) structure the page.
Why this matters
Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Element IDs are unique per document
Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
All inspected element IDs are unique within their documents.
Why this matters
Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Images4Looks good
100/100Looks good: Alt text coverage
Looks good · Images · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
All 14 visible images declare alt attributes (including empty alt for decorative images). Whether each description fits its image needs a human look.
Why this matters
Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Width/height attributes
Looks good · Images · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
All 14 visible images declare dimensions or are sized by their container.
Why this matters
Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Modern image formats
Looks good · Images · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
10 of 10 raster images have a WebP/AVIF source or come from a format-negotiating image service.
Why this matters
Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Lazy loading
Looks good · Images · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
14/14 images are lazy-loaded.
Why this matters
Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Links1Could be better5Looks good
100/100Could be better: External links use rel=noopener11 external link(s) open in a new tab without rel="noopener".
Could be better · Links · Review suggested
Observed evidence
11 external link(s) open in a new tab without rel="noopener".
Why this matters
Links are how visitors and crawlers reach the rest of the site. A broken one is a dead end. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Current browsers already treat target="_blank" as noopener, so the remaining risk is limited to older browsers. Adding rel="noopener" keeps the opened page from controlling yours there too.
Looks good: Internal links resolve
Looks good · Links · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
All 8 sampled internal links return < 400.
Why this matters
Links are how visitors and crawlers reach the rest of the site. A broken one is a dead end. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Anchor text is meaningful
Looks good · Links · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
29 of 30 links have descriptive text or labels.
Why this matters
Links are how visitors and crawlers reach the rest of the site. A broken one is a dead end. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: No dead placeholder links
Looks good · Links · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No placeholder links on the audited page.
Why this matters
Links are how visitors and crawlers reach the rest of the site. A broken one is a dead end. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Homepage links into the site
Looks good · Links · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Homepage links to 7 distinct internal pages.
Why this matters
Links are how visitors and crawlers reach the rest of the site. A broken one is a dead end. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Same-page links have source targets
Looks good · Links · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
1 same-page fragment link(s) have source targets.
Why this matters
Links are how visitors and crawlers reach the rest of the site. A broken one is a dead end. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Mobile2Could be better3Looks good1Informational
70/100Could be better: Interactive controls have source labels8 of 310 source controls lack a detectable name.
Could be better · Mobile · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
8 of 310 source controls lack a detectable name.
Why this matters
Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Give each control visible text, a connected label, aria-label or aria-labelledby. Placeholder and neighboring text alone do not name an input. Verify the browser accessibility tree after fixing.
Affected pages (7)
- https://livingbrain.com/
- https://livingbrain.com/about-us
- https://livingbrain.com/contact
- https://livingbrain.com/privacy-policy
- https://livingbrain.com/pricing
- https://livingbrain.com/stories
- https://livingbrain.com/terms-of-service
Could be better: ARIA references point to source elementsARIA references point at IDs that do not exist on 2 sampled page(s), e.g.
Could be better · Mobile · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
ARIA references point at IDs that do not exist on 2 sampled page(s), e.g. aria-labelledby="powered-by-heading", aria-labelledby="powerful-agents", aria-labelledby="powered-by-heading".
Why this matters
Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Connect ARIA references to unique existing IDs. If JavaScript adds the targets, verify the rendered accessibility tree.
Affected pages (2)
- https://livingbrain.com/
- https://livingbrain.com/about-us
Not measured: No tiny inline font sizesNo sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.
Not measured · Mobile · Not established
Observed evidence
No sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Check computed font sizes in a browser across mobile widths.
Looks good: Viewport meta tag
Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Viewport configured: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1".
Why this matters
Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled
Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
The viewport lets users zoom.
Why this matters
Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Responsive image markup
Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
9/14 images ship responsive srcset variants.
Why this matters
Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Language2Looks good1Informational
100/100Not applicable: hreflang syntaxNo hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.
Not applicable · Language · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.
Why this matters
The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
Only add hreflang if you publish the same content in multiple languages/regions.
Looks good: html lang attribute
Looks good · Language · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Language declared: lang="en".
Why this matters
The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Declared language matches content
Looks good · Language · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Declared language (en) matches detected content language.
Why this matters
The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Branding1Looks good3Informational
100/100Not measured: Apple touch iconNo apple-touch-icon link.
Not measured · Branding · Not established
Observed evidence
No apple-touch-icon link.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Add a 180×180 apple-touch-icon so iOS home-screen bookmarks show your logo instead of a screenshot.
Not measured: Web app manifestNo web manifest linked.
Not measured · Branding · Not established
Observed evidence
No web manifest linked.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Optional, but a manifest.json enables install prompts and better mobile integration.
Not measured: Theme colorNo theme-color meta tag.
Not measured · Branding · Not established
Observed evidence
No theme-color meta tag.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Add <meta name="theme-color"> to tint the mobile browser UI to your brand color. Small touch, feels polished.
Looks good: Favicon
Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (/icon.png?icon.f3fae57e.png).
Why this matters
These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Performance
Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.
| Measure | This site | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Script/stylesheet count | — | Could be better: needs attention22 scripts + 7 stylesheets on the homepage. |
| Web fonts don't block text | — | Informational: not applicableNo Google Fonts stylesheet links detected. |
| Server response time | 799 ms | Looks good: goodThe audit received response headers after 799 ms from one test location. |
| HTML payload size | 281 KB | Looks good: goodThe page's HTML is 281 KB uncompressed: acceptable, though under 100 KB is a good target for content pages. |
| No render-blocking head scripts | — | Looks good: goodNo synchronous render-blocking scripts in <head>. |
| Inline styles are bounded | 0.0 KB | Looks good: goodInline styles total 0.0 KB. |
| HTML served compressed | — | Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br. |
| Iframe usage | — | Looks good: goodNo iframes. |
| Source HTML weight | 281.2 KB | Informational: measured source, not transferred bytes281.2 KB of HTML on the audited page |
From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.
Security
HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.
Could be better: HSTS headerNo active Strict-Transport-Security max-age was observed.
Could be better · Security · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No active Strict-Transport-Security max-age was observed.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Add HSTS (e.g. max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains) so browsers never even try HTTP after the first visit.
Could be better: Content Security PolicyNo Content-Security-Policy detected.
Could be better · Security · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No Content-Security-Policy detected.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Configure an enforced policy for script and resource origins; use report-only monitoring to prepare changes safely.
Not applicable: Declared form submission targetsNo HTML forms were found.
Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No HTML forms were found.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
Check JavaScript-generated form transport separately if present.
Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.
Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
Review authentication forms separately when applicable.
Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Site serves over HTTPS.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: HTTP redirects to HTTPS
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
http:// permanently redirects to https://./
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Frame embedding protection
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Response headers restrict cross-origin framing (X-Frame-Options SAMEORIGIN).
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Referrer policy
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Referrer-Policy is strict-origin-when-cross-origin.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Browser feature permissions
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
A Permissions-Policy disables at least one sensitive browser feature.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Review remaining features and allow only origins the application needs.
Looks good: X-Content-Type-Options
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
nosniff is set.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: No mixed content
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No insecure subresources detected.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Server technology disclosure
Looks good · Security · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No X-Powered-By disclosure.
Why this matters
HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
AI answer readiness
Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.
Could be better: llms.txtNo /llms.txt file.
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No /llms.txt file.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Optional: publish an llms.txt index of useful pages. This proposal is not a requirement for Google AI features, and its absence does not reduce the core score.
Could be better: FAQ/QA schemaNo FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
If the page answers recurring questions, use visible question-and-answer content and matching FAQPage markup. QAPage is for a single question with user-submitted answers. Google FAQ rich results are restricted to eligible authoritative government and health sites; markup does not guarantee AI citations.
Could be better: Question-style headingsOnly 9% of 158 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested
Observed evidence
Only 9% of 158 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Phrase key subheadings as the questions users actually ask ("How much does X cost?"). This improves the measured question-heading signal; the audit does not guarantee citations.
Could be better: Definitional openingThe opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Loading...…"
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested
Observed evidence
The opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Loading...…"
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
"X is a Y that does Z for W" in the first paragraph gives answer engines a liftable definition of you. Write it once, benefit everywhere.
Could be better: Freshness signalsNo dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
For content where dates matter, show the actual update date and mirror it in dateModified. Do not invent dates or change them without a substantive update. Missing dates alone do not prove stale content.
Could be better: Question headings have concise answers4/14 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
4/14 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Put a direct 20–500 character answer paragraph immediately after each question heading so retrieval systems can quote it cleanly.
Affected pages (2)
- https://livingbrain.com/
- https://livingbrain.com/contact
Could be better: Machine-readable provenance signalsOnly 2 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, date.
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Only 2 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, date.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Add the missing author, date, breadcrumb, or contact signal so machines can identify provenance and site structure.
Affected pages (6)
- https://livingbrain.com/
- https://livingbrain.com/about-us
- https://livingbrain.com/contact
- https://livingbrain.com/privacy-policy
- https://livingbrain.com/pricing
- https://livingbrain.com/stories
Could be better: Markdown copies of pagesNo markdown copy answered at /index.md or /about-us.md or /index.html.md.
Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No markdown copy answered at /index.md or /about-us.md or /index.html.md.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Publish a clean markdown copy of each key page at /page.md (or /page.html.md). It strips navigation and scripts, so a retriever spends its budget on your content.
Affected pages (2)
- https://livingbrain.com/
- https://livingbrain.com/about-us
Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.
Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established
Observed evidence
No /llms-full.txt.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.
Not measured: Citable facts density35 concrete figures across 865 words.
Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established
Observed evidence
35 concrete figures across 865 words.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Good — keep facts specific and current, and date-stamp them.
Not measured: llms.txt links resolve to this siteNo readable llms.txt was available to inspect for Markdown links.
Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established
Observed evidence
No readable llms.txt was available to inspect for Markdown links.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Publish a readable llms.txt, then link its important pages with same-origin Markdown URLs.
Not measured: llms.txt follows the specNo readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.
Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established
Observed evidence
No readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Publish llms.txt first — the llms.txt check covers that — then this one verifies the structure.
Not applicable: Accept: text/markdown negotiationThe homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.
Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
The homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
Optional: return a stripped markdown body when the request asks for text/markdown. Some hosts and CDNs do this for you; a plain HTML answer is not a defect.
Not applicable: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectableNo OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.
Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.
Recommended fix
An API is optional. Add a service-desc link if you already publish a machine-readable API specification.
Looks good: AI crawler access
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers. Training/other-use opt-outs: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended; these do not reduce this search-access score.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Semantic HTML structure
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Semantic structure present: main×1, article×11, section×11, nav×2, header×1, footer×1.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Answers lead the section
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Paragraphs get to the point without preamble.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Content is chunkable
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Paragraphs average 30 words, lists present — chunk-friendly.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Cites external sources
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
82 outbound reference(s) across crawled pages.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Consistent brand entity
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Brand declared: og:site_name "Living Brain".
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Description reads as a liftable summary
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Meta description works as a standalone summary.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Entity identity agrees across signals
Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
The site is consistently named "Living Brain" and 2 identity URL(s) stay on livingbrain.com.
Why this matters
This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
AdSense readinessOptional
Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.
On its own, this site scores 61/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.
Could be better: Sampled publisher-content coverage1/4 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 4 pages hold 2334 publisher words in total.
Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical
Observed evidence
1/4 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 4 pages hold 2334 publisher words in total. 4 of the 8 sampled pages are support or tool pages and were excluded from this check.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Review whether each page fully serves its purpose. Expand incomplete editorial content with useful information; keep concise navigation and tool pages when they help visitors.
Affected pages (1)
- https://livingbrain.com/workspace
Could be better: Policy pages linked site-wide2/8 crawled pages don't link to the privacy policy.
Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested
Observed evidence
2/8 crawled pages don't link to the privacy policy.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.
Recommended fix
Place the privacy link in shared navigation or footer markup so users can reach disclosures from any sampled entry page.
Affected pages (2)
- https://livingbrain.com/pricing
- https://livingbrain.com/workspace
Not measured: First-party contact emailA contact page or form exists, but no public email address was found.
Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested
Observed evidence
A contact page or form exists, but no public email address was found.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
A public email is optional. The separate contact-method check covers whether readers have a way to reach the publisher.
Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.
Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established
Observed evidence
No ads.txt yet.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.
Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.
Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established
Observed evidence
Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.
Not measured: Latest article has real depthNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.
Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established
Observed evidence
No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reads the newest one.
Not measured: Latest article reads as edited workNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.
Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established
Observed evidence
No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reviews its style signals.
Not measured: Latest article names an author and a dateNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.
Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established
Observed evidence
No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.
Why this matters
This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.
Recommended fix
Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then looks for its byline and date.
Looks good: Privacy policy page
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Privacy policy found: https://livingbrain.com/privacy-policy
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Privacy policy advertising disclosures
Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule
Observed evidence
Fetched privacy policy contains cookie/storage, advertising, and third-party/vendor disclosure signals.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Terms page
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Terms page found: https://livingbrain.com/terms-of-service
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: About page
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
About page found: https://livingbrain.com/about-us
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Contact method
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Contact page found: https://livingbrain.com/contact
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Thin page share
Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested
Observed evidence
3/4 editorial pages clear the audit's publisher-content triage threshold. 4 of the 8 sampled pages are support or tool pages and were excluded from this check.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: No ads on non-content screens
Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule
Observed evidence
No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Tool pages expose explanatory content
Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested
Observed evidence
All 7 sampled tool-style screens include crawlable explanation.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs
Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested
Observed evidence
No high publisher-content repetition among 6 substantial sampled page(s).
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Publisher content exists in source HTML
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No empty client-rendered publisher shell in the crawl sample.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Article-style content exists
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Article-style content detected.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No "coming soon", "under construction" or lorem-ipsum text on crawled pages.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Show 4 more checks
Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
Language "en" is AdSense-supported.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Looks good: Existing ad scripts
Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page
Observed evidence
No competing ad scripts on the page.
Why this matters
A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.
Recommended fix
Nothing to do here.
Hosting and infrastructure
Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.
| Hostname | livingbrain.com |
|---|---|
| CDN / edge | Cloudflare |
| IP addresses | 172.67.153.192, 104.21.88.233, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:99c0, 2606:4700:3037::6815:58e9 |
| DNS A | 172.67.153.192 · 104.21.88.233 |
| DNS AAAA | 2606:4700:3037::6815:58e9 · 2606:4700:3031::ac43:99c0 |
| DNS NS | liz.ns.cloudflare.com · sonny.ns.cloudflare.com |
| DNS MX | 1 smtp.google.com |
| TLS | TLSv1.3TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 |
| Certificate issuer | Google Trust Services / WE1 |
| Certificate valid until | Jan 31 19:03:19 2027 GMT |
| Certificate validation | Passed |
Website anatomy and diagnostics
Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.
Page architecture
Choose a page to explore its details and connections.
Page content
721 publisher words
Page structure
html content
Observed discovery
Depth 0 · 6 incoming links
HTTP 200 · 281.2 KB source
Source interactions
40 controls · 1 unnamed
22 script / 7 stylesheet references
- Canonical declaration
- https://livingbrain.com/
- Schema types
- None observed
- Outgoing links in sampled graph
- /pricing · /stories · /about-us · /contact · /workspace · /privacy-policy · /terms-of-service
Routes: / · /about-us · /contact · /privacy-policy · /pricing · /stories · /workspace · /terms-of-service
Repeated metadata in the sample
Same description: a persistent and evolving intelligence layer that connects your context, surfaces non-obvious connections, and gives every agent shared memory, context and continuity.
/ · /about-us · /privacy-policy · /pricing · /workspace · /terms-of-service
Resource origins 4
Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.
- https://livingbrain.com/stylesheet, script, image · 257 references · same origin
- https://cdn.chatchat.com/image, media · 19 references · cross origin
- https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/script · 8 references · cross origin
- https://i.giphy.com/image · 5 references · cross origin
Crawler policy by page
Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.
| Crawler / purpose | Page | Policy | Matched directive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Googlebotsearch | / | allowed | allow: / |
| Googlebotsearch | /about-us | allowed | allow: / |
| Googlebotsearch | /contact | allowed | allow: / |
| Googlebotsearch | /privacy-policy | allowed | allow: / |
| Googlebotsearch | /pricing | allowed | allow: / |
| Googlebotsearch | /stories | allowed | allow: / |
| Googlebotsearch | /workspace | allowed | allow: / |
| Googlebotsearch | /terms-of-service | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | / | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | /about-us | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | /contact | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | /privacy-policy | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | /pricing | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | /stories | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | /workspace | allowed | allow: / |
| bingbotsearch | /terms-of-service | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | / | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | /about-us | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | /contact | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | /privacy-policy | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | /pricing | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | /stories | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | /workspace | allowed | allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotsearch | /terms-of-service | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | / | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | /about-us | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | /contact | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | /privacy-policy | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | /pricing | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | /stories | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | /workspace | allowed | allow: / |
| PerplexityBotsearch | /terms-of-service | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | / | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | /about-us | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | /contact | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | /privacy-policy | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | /pricing | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | /stories | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | /workspace | allowed | allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotsearch | /terms-of-service | allowed | allow: / |
| GPTBottraining | / | disallowed | disallow: / |
| GPTBottraining | /about-us | disallowed | disallow: / |
| GPTBottraining | /contact | disallowed | disallow: / |
| GPTBottraining | /privacy-policy | disallowed | disallow: / |
| GPTBottraining | /pricing | disallowed | disallow: / |
| GPTBottraining | /stories | disallowed | disallow: / |
| GPTBottraining | /workspace | disallowed | disallow: / |
| GPTBottraining | /terms-of-service | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | / | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | /about-us | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | /contact | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | /privacy-policy | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | /pricing | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | /stories | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | /workspace | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ClaudeBottraining | /terms-of-service | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | / | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | /about-us | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | /contact | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | /privacy-policy | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | /pricing | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | /stories | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | /workspace | disallowed | disallow: / |
| Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses | /terms-of-service | disallowed | disallow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | / | allowed | allow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | /about-us | allowed | allow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | /contact | allowed | allow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | /privacy-policy | allowed | allow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | /pricing | allowed | allow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | /stories | allowed | allow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | /workspace | allowed | allow: / |
| ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply | /terms-of-service | allowed | allow: / |
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces
No supported machine interfaces were advertised in the sampled HTML. An API or MCP server is optional; undiscovered interfaces remain unknown.
Public DNS and TLS endpoint
livingbrain.com · observed · 172.67.153.192, 104.21.88.233, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:99c0, 2606:4700:3037::6815:58e9
- A
- 172.67.153.192 · 104.21.88.233
- AAAA
- 2606:4700:3037::6815:58e9 · 2606:4700:3031::ac43:99c0
- CNAME
- Unavailable for this exact hostname
- NS
- liz.ns.cloudflare.com · sonny.ns.cloudflare.com
- MX
- 1 smtp.google.com
- CAA
- Unavailable for this exact hostname
TLS: TLSv1.3
Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.
Issuer: Google Trust Services / WE1
Certificate valid until: Jan 31 19:03:19 2027 GMT
PageSpeed measurement
Loading the PageSpeed panel…
Growth resources
Loading growth resources…
Where to take this site next
Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.
- 01
Your top fixes list is the priority order — clear the red items before creating more content.
- 02
Re-run the combined audit after each batch of fixes
Re-run after fixes to see which checks changed; score bands are guidance, not a guarantee of ranking, traffic, or approval.
Apply the recommended fixes
Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.
Report notes
- 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
- 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
- 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
- https://livingbrain.com/
- https://livingbrain.com/about-us
- https://livingbrain.com/contact
- https://livingbrain.com/privacy-policy
- https://livingbrain.com/pricing
- https://livingbrain.com/stories
- https://livingbrain.com/workspace
- https://livingbrain.com/terms-of-service