Website report

Visit sitehttps://research.meta.ai/

Research, releases, and ideas from Meta AI.

Audit Full discovery audit·Language American English (en-US)·Response HTTP 200·Served by Vercel

Analysed Nov 8, 2026 · 15 categories · 103 passed · 23 warnings · 2 issues · 22 informational

Audit score

C

83/100

Mixed

Agentic
87
SEO
91

What we found

2Needs a fix23Could be better103Looks good22Informational
  1. 1.Could be better: Your site details do not match. see checkConsistent names and details help AI assistants recognize your website.
  2. 2.Could be better: HTML payload size: needs attention. see checkFaster pages help visitors reach your content sooner.
  3. 3.Could be better: Your page embedding rules need tightening. see checkRestricting embedding helps prevent deceptive clicks on your content.
  4. 4.Could be better: Browsers can guess file types. see checkThe nosniff header helps stop files from being interpreted as executable code.
  5. 5.Could be better: Meta description length: needs attention. see checkClear titles and descriptions help people choose your pages in search.

Built with 2 technologies· detected stack

Read from the public source and response headers of the sampled pages.

How it fits together

  • Next.jsFramework
  • VercelHosting / edge
Hosting and deploymentType
  • VercelHosting / edge
Frameworks and librariesType
  • Next.jsFramework

A framework or CDN signal describes the public response, not the origin host or private backend.

Site checks

103 passed · 23 warnings · 2 issues

Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.

Metadata1Could be better10Looks good

100/100
Could be better: Meta description lengthDescription is 43 characters, under this audit's 70-character review point (a heuristic, not a Google minimum).

Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Description is 43 characters, under this audit's 70-character review point (a heuristic, not a Google minimum).

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add useful context if the summary omits the page purpose. Do not pad it or force keywords to reach a count.

Looks good: Page title exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title found: "Research | Meta AI Research"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title is 27 characters, inside this audit's 15–60 review range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title says what the site does

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title "Research | Meta AI Research" says more than the site name.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description found: "Research, releases, and ideas from Meta AI."

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Titles unique across pages

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 9 indexable sampled pages have distinct titles.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Character encoding declared

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

UTF-8 declared in the Content-Type header and a meta tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTML5 doctype

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HTML5 doctype declared.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta keywords tag

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No obsolete meta keywords tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Indexing16Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Single canonical declaration

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

One canonical declaration found.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No meta-refresh redirect.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No soft-404 response

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical target integrity

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Indexability signals align across 10 sampled URL(s).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 10 more checks
Looks good: robots.txt exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt responds with 200.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. Most specific matching path; allow wins equal-length conflicts.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap found at https://research.meta.ai/sitemap.xml.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap parses and lists URLs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap lists 18 same-origin URLs.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap declared in robots.txt

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt declares the sitemap.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical URL set

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical set: https://research.meta.ai/

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is absolute and points at this page.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: www vs apex consistency

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Hostname is used consistently (research.meta.ai).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: URLs are readable slugs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

URL slugs are readable (18 sampled).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No restrictive search-access signal on 10 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Content2Could be better8Looks good1Informational

100/100
Could be better: Homepage content volumeThe audited page has about 222 words of main content, on the thin side.

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The audited page has about 222 words of main content, on the thin side.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add useful text where a visitor would expect it: what this is, who it is for, and answers to the questions a first-time visitor asks. Word count itself is not a ranking factor.

Could be better: Text-to-HTML ratioVisible text is 2.7% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Could be better · Content · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Visible text is 2.7% of the HTML markup (scripts and styles excluded).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Text-to-HTML ratio is not a ranking factor, but a very low value often means deeply nested markup or content that only appears after JavaScript runs. Check the source-content checks before changing anything.

Not measured: ReadabilityFlesch reading ease ≈ 2 — very difficult.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Flesch reading ease ≈ 2 — very difficult.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Shorten sentences and prefer plain words. Aim for 50–70 for a general audience.

Looks good: Crawlable content in source HTML

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No recognized empty JavaScript application shell on 10 sampled page(s). The entered page exposes 222 publisher word(s).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No placeholder text

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No starter-template leftovers

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No starter-template artifacts detected.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Title and H1 agree

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title and H1 share topic words: meta, research.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicates

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No near-duplicate main content among 10 indexable sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No deprecated HTML tags

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No deprecated HTML tags.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Outbound references

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

16 outbound link(s) present.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pages

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No repeated description, H1, or publisher copy across 10 sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Social sharing8Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Open Graph title

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:title: "Meta AI Research"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph description

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:description: "Research, releases, and ideas from Meta AI."

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph image

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image is set: "https://research.meta.ai/articles/introducing-muse-wonder/social/muse-wonder-social-v1.web%E2%80%A6"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image loads

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image returns 200 (image/webp).

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image dimensions declared

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Dimensions declared: 1200×630.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:url and og:type

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:url and og:type ("website") are set.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Twitter/X card

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

twitter:card is "summary_large_image".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:site_name

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:site_name: "Meta AI Research".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Structured data4Looks good1Informational

100/100
Not measured: Breadcrumb schema on inner pagesNone of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Not measured · Structured data · Not established

Observed evidence

None of the 9 crawled inner pages declare BreadcrumbList schema.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add BreadcrumbList to inner pages — Google shows breadcrumbs in results and it clarifies site structure.

Affected pages (9)

  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wonder
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaai
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-research
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-spark-open
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-models
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/developing-capable-models-responsibly
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/solving-open-research-problems-together
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-life
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-muse
Reference
Looks good: JSON-LD present

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 JSON-LD block(s) found on the homepage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: JSON-LD parses

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 10 JSON-LD block(s) parse cleanly.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Organization or WebSite schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Identity schema present: Organization.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content-specific schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Content schema found: BlogPosting.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Headings7Looks good

100/100
Looks good: H1 exists

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 found: "Latest from Meta AI Research"

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Single H1

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Exactly one H1 on the homepage.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Heading levels don't skip

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Heading hierarchy is sequential across 24 headings.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: H1 has real text

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 reads "Latest from Meta AI Research".

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Headings are descriptive

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

24 headings, averaging 6.2 words — descriptive.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is sectioned with H2s

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

23 H2 section(s) structure the page.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Element IDs are unique per document

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All inspected element IDs are unique within their documents.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Images4Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Alt text coverage

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 4 visible images declare alt attributes (including empty alt for decorative images). Whether each description fits its image needs a human look.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Width/height attributes

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 4 visible images declare dimensions or are sized by their container.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Modern image formats

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 of 1 raster images have a WebP/AVIF source or come from a format-negotiating image service.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Lazy loading

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

3/4 images are lazy-loaded.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Mobile5Looks good1Informational

100/100
Not measured: No tiny inline font sizesNo sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Not measured · Mobile · Not established

Observed evidence

No sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Check computed font sizes in a browser across mobile widths.

Looks good: Viewport meta tag

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Viewport configured: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1".

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The viewport lets users zoom.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Responsive image markup

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

2/4 images ship responsive srcset variants.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Interactive controls have source labels

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

439 source controls have detectable names. Browser accessibility and CSS visibility were not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: ARIA references point to source elements

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

100 ARIA reference(s) resolve within their source documents. Rendered visibility was not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Language2Looks good1Informational

100/100
Not applicable: hreflang syntaxNo hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Not applicable · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Only add hreflang if you publish the same content in multiple languages/regions.

Looks good: html lang attribute

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language declared: lang="en-US".

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Declared language matches content

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Declared language (en) matches detected content language.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Branding1Looks good3Informational

100/100
Not measured: Apple touch iconNo apple-touch-icon link.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No apple-touch-icon link.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add a 180×180 apple-touch-icon so iOS home-screen bookmarks show your logo instead of a screenshot.

Not measured: Web app manifestNo web manifest linked.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No web manifest linked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional, but a manifest.json enables install prompts and better mobile integration.

Not measured: Theme colorNo theme-color meta tag.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No theme-color meta tag.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add <meta name="theme-color"> to tint the mobile browser UI to your brand color. Small touch, feels polished.

Looks good: Favicon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (/icon.svg?v=1).

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Performance

91/100

Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.

Performance measurements observed during the audit
MeasureThis siteReading
HTML payload size320 KBCould be better: needs attentionThe page's HTML is 320 KB uncompressed.
Web fonts don't block text—Informational: not applicableNo Google Fonts stylesheet links detected.
Server response time245 msLooks good: goodThe audit received response headers after 245 ms from one test location.
No render-blocking head scripts—Looks good: goodNo synchronous render-blocking scripts in <head>.
Inline styles are bounded0.0 KBLooks good: goodInline styles total 0.0 KB.
Script/stylesheet count—Looks good: good21 total script/style resources — reasonable.
HTML served compressed—Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br.
Iframe usage—Looks good: goodNo iframes.
Source HTML weight320.4 KBInformational: measured source, not transferred bytes320.4 KB of HTML on the audited page

From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.

Security

86/100

HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.

Could be better: Frame embedding protectionNo frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Send Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' (or 'none', or a list of partner origins), or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN. It stops other sites from framing your pages to trick visitors into clicking (clickjacking).

Reference
Could be better: X-Content-Type-OptionsX-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is not set.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is not set.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add it — one header, stops MIME-sniffing attacks. Most hosts let you set headers in config (vercel.json, netlify.toml, next.config).

Could be better: Content Security PolicyNo Content-Security-Policy detected.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Content-Security-Policy detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Configure an enforced policy for script and resource origins; use report-only monitoring to prepare changes safely.

Reference
Could be better: Browser feature permissionsNo explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Disable unused camera, microphone, or geolocation access using Permissions-Policy.

Could be better: Server technology disclosureThe X-Powered-By header advertises "Next.js".

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The X-Powered-By header advertises "Next.js".

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

You can remove it (in Next.js: poweredByHeader: false; in Express: app.disable('x-powered-by')). It adds bytes to every response and tells scanners what to probe; it is not a vulnerability by itself.

Not applicable: Declared form submission targetsNo HTML forms were found.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No HTML forms were found.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Check JavaScript-generated form transport separately if present.

Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Review authentication forms separately when applicable.

Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Site serves over HTTPS.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTTP redirects to HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

http:// permanently redirects to https://./

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HSTS header

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HSTS is set: max-age=63072000.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Referrer policy

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No Referrer-Policy is set, so browsers apply their default, strict-origin-when-cross-origin, which sends only the origin to other sites.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No mixed content

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No insecure subresources detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AI answer readiness

67/100

Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.

Could be better: Entity identity agrees across signalsEntity identity is inconsistent: the declared names differ (og:site_name "Meta AI Research", Organization name "Meta AI Research", Organization name "Meta Platforms, Inc."); Organization url https://about.meta.com/ points to a different site than research.meta.ai.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Entity identity is inconsistent: the declared names differ (og:site_name "Meta AI Research", Organization name "Meta AI Research", Organization name "Meta Platforms, Inc."); Organization url https://about.meta.com/ points to a different site than research.meta.ai.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Use one name for the site everywhere it is declared (Organization/WebSite schema, og:site_name, the title) and point identity URLs at this site.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://research.meta.ai/
Could be better: llms.txtNo /llms.txt file.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No /llms.txt file.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Optional: publish an llms.txt index of useful pages. This proposal is not a requirement for Google AI features, and its absence does not reduce the core score.

Reference
Could be better: FAQ/QA schemaNo FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No FAQPage or QAPage schema on any crawled page.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

If the page answers recurring questions, use visible question-and-answer content and matching FAQPage markup. QAPage is for a single question with user-submitted answers. Google FAQ rich results are restricted to eligible authoritative government and health sites; markup does not guarantee AI citations.

Reference
Could be better: Question-style headingsOnly 2% of 136 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 2% of 136 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Phrase key subheadings as the questions users actually ask ("How much does X cost?"). This improves the measured question-heading signal; the audit does not guarantee citations.

Could be better: Question headings have concise answers1/3 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1/3 question-shaped heading(s) have a 20–500 character paragraph immediately after them.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Put a direct 20–500 character answer paragraph immediately after each question heading so retrieval systems can quote it cleanly.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://research.meta.ai/
Could be better: Machine-readable provenance signalsOnly 3 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, date, contact.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Only 3 of 4 provenance signal types were found: author, date, contact.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add the missing author, date, breadcrumb, or contact signal so machines can identify provenance and site structure.

Affected pages (9)

  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wonder
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaai
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-research
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-spark-open
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-models
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/developing-capable-models-responsibly
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/solving-open-research-problems-together
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-life
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-muse
Could be better: Markdown copies of pagesNo markdown copy answered at /index.md or /blog/muse-wonder.md or /index.html.md.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No markdown copy answered at /index.md or /blog/muse-wonder.md or /index.html.md.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a clean markdown copy of each key page at /page.md (or /page.html.md). It strips navigation and scripts, so a retriever spends its budget on your content.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://research.meta.ai/
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wonder
Reference
Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No /llms-full.txt.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.

Reference
Not measured: Citable facts density44 concrete figures across 271 words.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

44 concrete figures across 271 words.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Good — keep facts specific and current, and date-stamp them.

Not measured: Description reads as a liftable summaryDescription is short or non-declarative: "Research, releases, and ideas from Meta AI.…"

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

Description is short or non-declarative: "Research, releases, and ideas from Meta AI.…"

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Prefer a complete declarative sentence over slogans or questions — it should stand alone when quoted out of context.

Not measured: llms.txt follows the specNo readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No readable /llms.txt, so its structure cannot be checked.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish llms.txt first — the llms.txt check covers that — then this one verifies the structure.

Reference
Not applicable: Accept: text/markdown negotiationThe homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Optional: return a stripped markdown body when the request asks for text/markdown. Some hosts and CDNs do this for you; a plain HTML answer is not a defect.

Not applicable: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectableNo OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

An API is optional. Add a service-desc link if you already publish a machine-readable API specification.

Looks good: AI crawler access

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Authored, dated articles

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

9 article(s) with author + date metadata.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Semantic HTML structure

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Semantic structure present: main×1, article×18, section×2, nav×5, header×2, footer×1.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Answers lead the section

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs get to the point without preamble.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is chunkable

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs average 62 words, lists present — chunk-friendly.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Definitional opening

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Opening paragraph reads as a definition.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Freshness signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

dateModified present in schema.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Cites external sources

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

226 outbound reference(s) across crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Consistent brand entity

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Brand declared: og:site_name "Meta AI Research" + identity schema.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AdSense readinessOptional

17/100

Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.

On its own, this site scores 23/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.

Needs a fix: Privacy policy pageNo privacy policy page is linked or crawlable.

Needs a fix · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

No privacy policy page is linked or crawlable.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Publish an accessible privacy policy that discloses cookies and data use by Google and other third-party ad vendors.

Reference
Needs a fix: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages1 sampled page(s) still read as unfinished — found "coming soon".

Needs a fix · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

1 sampled page(s) still read as unfinished — found "coming soon".

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. Right now the sampled pages don't provide it.

Recommended fix

Finish those pages, or redirect, noindex or remove them. Google policy prohibits ads on screens under construction.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-muse
Reference
Could be better: Sampled publisher-content coverage1/10 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 10 pages hold 14543 publisher words in total.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggestedCritical

Observed evidence

1/10 editorial pages expose fewer than 250 publisher words; those 10 pages hold 14543 publisher words in total.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Review whether each page fully serves its purpose. Expand incomplete editorial content with useful information; keep concise navigation and tool pages when they help visitors.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://research.meta.ai/
Reference
Could be better: Latest article has real depthThe newest article has 509 words of body text.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Measured on your pageCritical

Observed evidence

The newest article has 509 words of body text.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Check that the page covers the question end to end. Short is fine when the topic is small; it reads as thin when the title promises a guide.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaai
Reference
Could be better: Terms pageNo terms of use page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No terms of use page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Consider adding terms that identify the service rules and publisher. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense requirement.

Could be better: About pageNo about page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No about page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an About page that identifies the publisher, site purpose, and relevant experience. This supports content transparency but is not a standalone AdSense requirement.

Could be better: Contact methodNo contact page or mailto link found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No contact page or mailto link found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add a working contact route or visible email so users can reach the publisher. This is a trust heuristic, not a published approval rule.

Could be better: Author bylines on content1/10 sampled editorial pages lack detectable author attribution.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/10 sampled editorial pages lack detectable author attribution.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Identify who created editorial content with a visible byline, author link, or matching Article author markup. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense approval rule.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://research.meta.ai/
Reference
Could be better: Author or publisher background4/9 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

4/9 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Link the byline to an author profile or About page, or add truthful structured author details. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense approval rule.

Affected pages (4)

  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaai
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-spark-open
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/developing-capable-models-responsibly
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-muse
Reference
Not measured: Privacy policy advertising disclosuresA privacy page was not present in the crawl sample, so its disclosures could not be verified.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

A privacy page was not present in the crawl sample, so its disclosures could not be verified.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Confirm the policy explains cookies or similar storage, Google or advertising vendors, and third-party data use.

Reference
Not measured: First-party contact emailNo public contact email was found in the sampled home, About, or Contact pages.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No public contact email was found in the sampled home, About, or Contact pages.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

A public email is optional. The separate contact-method check covers whether readers have a way to reach the publisher.

Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No ads.txt yet.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.

Reference
Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.

Reference
Looks good: Thin page share

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

10/10 editorial pages clear the audit's publisher-content triage threshold.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No ads on non-content screens

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Looks good: Tool pages expose explanatory content

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

All 10 sampled tool-style screens include crawlable explanation.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No high publisher-content repetition among 9 substantial sampled page(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content exists in source HTML

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No empty client-rendered publisher shell in the crawl sample.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Clear navigation

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Navigation present with 14 links.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Article-style content exists

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Article-style content detected.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language "en" is AdSense-supported.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 4 more checks
Looks good: Existing ad scripts

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No competing ad scripts on the page.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Latest article reads as edited work

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Style pattern score 0/100 on the newest article. These are style patterns in the sampled text, not a determination of how the page was written.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Latest article names an author and a date

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The newest article shows both an author and a date.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Hosting and infrastructure

Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.

Hosting and infrastructure observations
Hostnameresearch.meta.ai
HostingVercel
IP addresses157.240.254.12, 2a03:2880:f366:8d:face:b00c:0:2
DNS A157.240.254.12
DNS AAAA2a03:2880:f366:8d:face:b00c:0:2
DNS CNAMEstar.c10r.facebook.com
DNS MX10 smtpin.vvv.facebook.com
TLSTLSv1.3TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
Certificate issuerDigiCert Inc / DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Certificate valid untilNov 15 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Certificate validationPassed

Website anatomy and diagnostics

Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.

Page architecture

Choose a page to explore its details and connections.

Page content

222 publisher words

Page structure

html content

Observed discovery

Depth 0 · 9 incoming links

HTTP 200 · 320.4 KB source

Source interactions

41 controls · 0 unnamed

17 script / 4 stylesheet references

Canonical declaration
https://research.meta.ai/
Schema types
Organization
Outgoing links in sampled graph
/blog/muse-wonder · /blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaai · /blog/supporting-medical-scientific-research · /blog/muse-spark-open · /blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-models · /blog/developing-capable-models-responsibly · /blog/solving-open-research-problems-together · /blog/bringing-your-muse-to-life · /blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-muse · /blog/introducing-muse-spark-1-3 · /blog/introducing-muse-voice-transcribe · /blog/multimodal-intelligence-of-muse-spark-1-2 · /blog/addressing-third-party-testing-misconfiguration-muse-spark-1-1 · /blog/introducing-muse-glimmer-open-agentic-model · /blog/introducing-muse-code-and-muse-spark-1-2 · /blog/introducing-muse-spark-meta-model-api · /blog/introducing-muse-spark-msl · /blog/introducing-next-generation-unified-media-generation-model

Routes: / · /blog

Resource origins 5

Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.

  • https://research.meta.ai/stylesheet, script, image, frame · 271 references · same origin
  • https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/image · 1 references · cross origin
  • https://video-iad3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/media · 1 references · cross origin
  • https://video-iad6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/media · 1 references · cross origin
  • https://video-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/media · 1 references · cross origin
Crawler policy by page

Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.

Robots policy for every evaluated crawler and sampled page
Crawler / purposePagePolicyMatched directive
Googlebotsearch/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/muse-wonderallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaaiallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-researchallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/muse-spark-openallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-modelsallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/developing-capable-models-responsiblyallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/solving-open-research-problems-togetherallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-lifeallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-museallowedallow: /
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces

No supported machine interfaces were advertised in the sampled HTML. An API or MCP server is optional; undiscovered interfaces remain unknown.

Public DNS and TLS endpoint

research.meta.ai · observed · 157.240.254.12, 2a03:2880:f366:8d:face:b00c:0:2

A
157.240.254.12
AAAA
2a03:2880:f366:8d:face:b00c:0:2
CNAME
star.c10r.facebook.com
NS
Unavailable for this exact hostname
MX
10 smtpin.vvv.facebook.com
CAA
Unavailable for this exact hostname

TLS: TLSv1.3

Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.

Issuer: DigiCert Inc / DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1

Certificate valid until: Nov 15 23:59:59 2026 GMT

PageSpeed measurement

Loading the PageSpeed panel…

Growth resources

Loading growth resources…

Where to take this site next

Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.

  1. 01

    Build content depth around real keywords

    Technical basics are in place — use pages that answer actual searches as the next content focus. This audit does not measure rankings.

  2. 02

    Steal from our keyword datasets

    Curated keyword collections by niche give you a content calendar without paid tools.

  3. 03

    Fix AdSense policy signals

    Make policy pages, publisher disclosures and substantial content reachable before applying. This audit cannot predict approval.

Apply the recommended fixes

Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.

Open in ChatGPT Open in Grok Open in Perplexity

Report notes

  • 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
  • 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
  • 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
  • https://research.meta.ai/
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wonder
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/specialized-models-for-muse-and-metaai
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/supporting-medical-scientific-research
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-spark-open
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/accelerating-scientific-research-in-health-data-science-with-muse-models
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/developing-capable-models-responsibly
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/solving-open-research-problems-together
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/bringing-your-muse-to-life
  • https://research.meta.ai/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-agents-our-approach-with-muse