Website report

Visit sitehttps://royak.app/

Give your AI employees a goal in plain words. They plan it, do it where you can watch in a live 3D office, and hand you the result; nothing leaves without your OK. Start free.

Audit Full discovery audit·Language English (en)·Response HTTP 200·Served by Cloudflare

Analysed Nov 7, 2026 · 15 categories · 115 passed · 17 warnings · 18 informational

Audit score

C

80/100

Mixed

Agentic
100
SEO
80

What we found

17Could be better115Looks good18Informational
  1. 1.Could be better: Server response time: needs attention. see checkFaster pages help visitors reach your content sooner.
  2. 2.Could be better: Your headings skip levels. see checkA clear outline makes content easier to navigate, including with a screen reader.
  3. 3.Could be better: Your site does not enforce future HTTPS visits. see checkHSTS keeps returning visitors on a secure connection.
  4. 4.Could be better: Your page embedding rules need tightening. see checkRestricting embedding helps prevent deceptive clicks on your content.
  5. 5.Could be better: Browsers can guess file types. see checkThe nosniff header helps stop files from being interpreted as executable code.

Built with 2 technologies· detected stack

Read from the public source and response headers of the sampled pages.

How it fits together

  • Next.jsFramework
  • CloudflareCDN / edge
InfrastructureType
  • CloudflareCDN / edge
Frameworks and librariesType
  • Next.jsFramework

A framework or CDN signal describes the public response, not the origin host or private backend.

Site checks

115 passed · 17 warnings · 0 issues

Every observation from the crawl, grouped by what it describes. Open a row for the evidence and the recommended fix.

Metadata1Could be better10Looks good

100/100
Could be better: Meta description lengthDescription is 175 characters, over this audit's 160-character review point (a preview heuristic, not a Google limit).

Could be better · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Description is 175 characters, over this audit's 160-character review point (a preview heuristic, not a Google limit).

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Front-load the useful summary because Google may generate or truncate snippets by query and device.

Looks good: Page title exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title found: "Royak: AI employees that get the work back to you, done"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title length

Looks good · Metadata · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Title is 55 characters, inside this audit's 15–60 review range.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title says what the site does

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title "Royak: AI employees that get the work back to you, done" says more than the site name.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Meta description exists

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description found: "Give your AI employees a goal in plain words. They plan it, do it where you can watch in a…"

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Titles unique across pages

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 9 indexable sampled pages have distinct titles.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: Homepage isn't noindexed

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No blocking robots meta tag on the homepage.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Character encoding declared

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

UTF-8 declared in the Content-Type header and a meta tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTML5 doctype

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

HTML5 doctype declared.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta keywords tag

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No obsolete meta keywords tag.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Valid metadata order in <head>

Looks good · Metadata · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No invalid element interrupts metadata in <head>.

Why this matters

The title and description are the text someone reads in a search result before deciding whether to click. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Indexing16Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Single canonical declaration

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

One canonical declaration found.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Noindex and canonical agree

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No conflicting noindex and cross-page canonical instructions.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No meta-refresh redirect

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No meta-refresh redirect.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No soft-404 response

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No soft-404 pattern on sampled HTTP 200 pages.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical target integrity

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is a valid https URL. Its host is checked by the canonical consistency check.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled URLs have aligned indexability signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Indexability signals align across 10 sampled URL(s).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 10 more checks
Looks good: robots.txt exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt responds with 200.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: robots.txt doesn't block everything

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for Googlebot. Most specific matching path; allow wins equal-length conflicts.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap exists

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap found at https://royak.app/sitemap.xml.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap parses and lists URLs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Sitemap lists 101 same-origin URLs.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sitemap declared in robots.txt

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

robots.txt declares the sitemap.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical URL set

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical set: https://royak.app/

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Canonical is absolute and self-referencing

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Canonical is absolute and points at this page.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: www vs apex consistency

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Hostname is used consistently (royak.app).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: URLs are readable slugs

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

URL slugs are readable (25 sampled).

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled pages expose search-access signals

Looks good · Indexing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No restrictive search-access signal on 10 sampled page(s). Actual indexing is not verified.

Why this matters

These rules decide whether the page can be indexed at all. One wrong directive hides good work. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Content9Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not measured: ReadabilityFlesch reading ease ≈ 57.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Flesch reading ease ≈ 57.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

60+ reads easily for most visitors. This is a heuristic, not a rule — technical audiences tolerate denser text.

Not measured: Outbound referencesSubstantial content but zero outbound links.

Not measured · Content · Not established

Observed evidence

Substantial content but zero outbound links.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Link to sources for your claims. This check reports whether outbound references are present; it does not measure content quality, retrieval, or citation outcomes.

Looks good: Crawlable content in source HTML

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No recognized empty JavaScript application shell on 10 sampled page(s). The entered page exposes 1090 publisher word(s).

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Homepage content volume

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited page has about 1090 words of main content.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Text-to-HTML ratio

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Text-to-HTML ratio is 9.2%.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No placeholder text

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No placeholder text detected on crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 5 more checks
Looks good: No starter-template leftovers

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No starter-template artifacts detected.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Title and H1 agree

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Title and H1 share topic words: get, back, done.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Crawled pages aren't near-duplicates

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No near-duplicate main content among 9 indexable sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No deprecated HTML tags

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No deprecated HTML tags.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Discovery copy is distinct across sampled pages

Looks good · Content · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No repeated description, H1, or publisher copy across 9 sampled pages.

Why this matters

This is the substance of the page. Placeholders and repeated copy make it read as unfinished. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Social sharing8Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Open Graph title

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:title: "Royak: AI employees that get the work back to you, done"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph description

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:description: "Give your AI employees a goal in plain words. They plan it, do it where you can watch in a…"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Open Graph image

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image is set: "https://royak.app/og-office.png"

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image loads

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:image returns 200 (image/png).

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Share image dimensions declared

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Dimensions declared: 1200×630.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:url and og:type

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:url and og:type ("website") are set.

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Twitter/X card

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

twitter:card is "summary_large_image".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: og:site_name

Looks good · Social sharing · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

og:site_name: "Royak".

Why this matters

This is what your link looks like when someone drops it into a chat or a feed. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Structured data5Looks good

100/100
Looks good: JSON-LD present

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 JSON-LD block(s) found on the homepage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: JSON-LD parses

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 6 JSON-LD block(s) parse cleanly.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Organization or WebSite schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Identity schema present: WebSite, Organization.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Breadcrumb schema on inner pages

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

4/9 inner pages have breadcrumb schema.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content-specific schema

Looks good · Structured data · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Content schema found: Offer, FAQPage, SoftwareApplication, ItemList, CollectionPage.

Why this matters

Structured data tells machines who published the page and what it describes. Broken markup is ignored outright. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Headings1Could be better6Looks good

91/100
Could be better: Heading levels don't skip1 heading level skip: H2 → H4 "Product".

Could be better · Headings · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1 heading level skip: H2 → H4 "Product".

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Use the next level down for each subsection (H2 under H1, H3 under H2). If a heading level was chosen for its font size, keep the level and change the styling instead.

Looks good: H1 exists

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 found: "Give it a goal. Get the launch back, done."

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Single H1

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Exactly one H1 on the homepage.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: H1 has real text

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

H1 reads "Give it a goal. Get the launch back, done.".

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Headings are descriptive

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

21 headings, averaging 4.9 words — descriptive.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is sectioned with H2s

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

6 H2 section(s) structure the page.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Element IDs are unique per document

Looks good · Headings · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All inspected element IDs are unique within their documents.

Why this matters

Headings are the outline every parser and screen reader follows to find the answer. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Images4Looks good

100/100
Looks good: Alt text coverage

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 22 visible images declare alt attributes (including empty alt for decorative images). Whether each description fits its image needs a human look.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Width/height attributes

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

All 22 visible images declare dimensions or are sized by their container.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Modern image formats

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

22 of 22 raster images have a WebP/AVIF source or come from a format-negotiating image service.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Lazy loading

Looks good · Images · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

17/22 images are lazy-loaded.

Why this matters

Alt text is what a screen reader announces, and what image search and AI systems read in place of the picture. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Mobile4Looks good2Informational

100/100
Not applicable: Responsive image markupNone of the 70 images use srcset.

Not applicable · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

None of the 70 images use srcset.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Serve smaller variants to phones with srcset/sizes (next/image handles this) — mobile users shouldn't download desktop-sized images.

Not measured: No tiny inline font sizesNo sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Not measured · Mobile · Not established

Observed evidence

No sub-12px inline font sizes detected; stylesheet rules and rendered sizes were not measured.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Check computed font sizes in a browser across mobile widths.

Looks good: Viewport meta tag

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Viewport configured: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1, viewport-fit=cover".

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Pinch zoom not disabled

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The viewport lets users zoom.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Interactive controls have source labels

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

884 source controls have detectable names. Browser accessibility and CSS visibility were not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: ARIA references point to source elements

Looks good · Mobile · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

24 ARIA reference(s) resolve within their source documents. Rendered visibility was not tested.

Why this matters

Google indexes the phone rendering, so that is the version being graded. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Language2Looks good1Informational

100/100
Not applicable: hreflang syntaxNo hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Not applicable · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No hreflang tags — fine for single-language sites.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Only add hreflang if you publish the same content in multiple languages/regions.

Looks good: html lang attribute

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language declared: lang="en".

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Declared language matches content

Looks good · Language · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Declared language (en) matches detected content language.

Why this matters

The declared language tells browsers and assistive tech how to read the page and who it is for. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Branding3Looks good1Informational

100/100
Not measured: Theme colorNo theme-color meta tag.

Not measured · Branding · Not established

Observed evidence

No theme-color meta tag.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add <meta name="theme-color"> to tint the mobile browser UI to your brand color. Small touch, feels polished.

Looks good: Favicon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Favicon declared via <link rel="icon"> (/favicon.svg).

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Apple touch icon

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

apple-touch-icon is declared.

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Web app manifest

Looks good · Branding · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Web manifest links and parses correctly.

Why this matters

These icons are what appear in browser tabs, bookmarks and search results. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Performance

75/100

Measured from the audited response and its markup. These are source observations, not field Core Web Vitals.

Performance measurements observed during the audit
MeasureThis siteReading
Server response time1184 msCould be better: needs attentionThe audit received response headers after 1184 ms from one test location.
Web fonts don't block text—Informational: not applicableNo Google Fonts stylesheet links detected.
HTML payload size231 KBLooks good: goodThe page's HTML is 231 KB uncompressed: acceptable, though under 100 KB is a good target for content pages.
No render-blocking head scripts—Looks good: goodNo synchronous render-blocking scripts in <head>.
Inline styles are bounded8.4 KBLooks good: goodInline styles total 8.4 KB.
Script/stylesheet count—Looks good: good9 total script/style resources — reasonable.
HTML served compressed—Looks good: goodHTML is compressed with br.
Iframe usage—Looks good: goodNo iframes.
Source HTML weight231.4 KBInformational: measured source, not transferred bytes231.4 KB of HTML on the audited page

From a single automated fetch of the audited page. A quick reading, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data.

Security

83/100

HTTPS, transport security and the response headers the audited pages send.

Could be better: HSTS headerNo active Strict-Transport-Security max-age was observed.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No active Strict-Transport-Security max-age was observed.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add HSTS (e.g. max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains) so browsers never even try HTTP after the first visit.

Reference
Could be better: Frame embedding protectionNo frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No frame-embedding restriction was observed (neither CSP frame-ancestors nor X-Frame-Options).

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Send Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' (or 'none', or a list of partner origins), or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN. It stops other sites from framing your pages to trick visitors into clicking (clickjacking).

Reference
Could be better: X-Content-Type-OptionsX-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is not set.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is not set.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add it — one header, stops MIME-sniffing attacks. Most hosts let you set headers in config (vercel.json, netlify.toml, next.config).

Could be better: Content Security PolicyNo Content-Security-Policy detected.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No Content-Security-Policy detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Configure an enforced policy for script and resource origins; use report-only monitoring to prepare changes safely.

Reference
Could be better: Browser feature permissionsNo explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Could be better · Security · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No explicit restriction on sensitive browser features was observed.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Disable unused camera, microphone, or geolocation access using Permissions-Policy.

Not applicable: Password forms avoid URL submissionNo enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Not applicable · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No enabled, named password inputs in sampled HTML.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Review authentication forms separately when applicable.

Looks good: Site serves over HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Site serves over HTTPS.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: HTTP redirects to HTTPS

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

http:// permanently redirects to https://./

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Referrer policy

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No Referrer-Policy is set, so browsers apply their default, strict-origin-when-cross-origin, which sends only the origin to other sites.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No mixed content

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No insecure subresources detected.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Server technology disclosure

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No X-Powered-By disclosure.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Declared form submission targets

Looks good · Security · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

1 declared form(s) submit over HTTPS to this site. Runtime submission behavior is untested.

Why this matters

HTTPS protects what visitors send you, and response headers limit what a hostile page can do in their browser. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AI answer readiness

100/100

Retrieval signals an answer engine relies on: crawler access, clear entities and answers it can quote. These checks do not measure citations or traffic.

Could be better: Question-style headingsOnly 14% of 93 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Only 14% of 93 H2/H3 headings are question-shaped.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Phrase key subheadings as the questions users actually ask ("How much does X cost?"). This improves the measured question-heading signal; the audit does not guarantee citations.

Could be better: Definitional openingThe opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Royak gives your company a team of AI employees.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

The opening paragraph doesn't define what the site/topic is: "Royak gives your company a team of AI employees. Say what you need in plain word…"

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

"X is a Y that does Z for W" in the first paragraph gives answer engines a liftable definition of you. Write it once, benefit everywhere.

Could be better: Freshness signalsNo dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No dateModified schema or visible 'updated' dates found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

For content where dates matter, show the actual update date and mirror it in dateModified. Do not invent dates or change them without a substantive update. Missing dates alone do not prove stale content.

Could be better: Markdown copies of pagesNo markdown copy answered at /index.md or /privacy.md or /index.html.md.

Could be better · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No markdown copy answered at /index.md or /privacy.md or /index.html.md.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Publish a clean markdown copy of each key page at /page.md (or /page.html.md). It strips navigation and scripts, so a retriever spends its budget on your content.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://royak.app/
  • https://royak.app/privacy
Reference
Not measured: llms-full.txtNo /llms-full.txt.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No /llms-full.txt.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Optional companion to llms.txt containing your full content as one markdown file — useful for sites whose pages are JS-heavy.

Reference
Not measured: Authored, dated articlesNo Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

No Article/BlogPosting schema found.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Add Article schema with author and datePublished so the page exposes clear provenance for retrieval. This audit does not measure or guarantee citations or rankings.

Not measured: Citable facts density70 concrete figures across 1521 words.

Not measured · AI answer readiness · Not established

Observed evidence

70 concrete figures across 1521 words.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Good — keep facts specific and current, and date-stamp them.

Not applicable: Accept: text/markdown negotiationThe homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The homepage answered Accept: text/markdown with text/html; charset=utf-8.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

Optional: return a stripped markdown body when the request asks for text/markdown. Some hosts and CDNs do this for you; a plain HTML answer is not a defect.

Not applicable: Advertised machine interfaces are inspectableNo OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Not applicable · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No OpenAPI interface was advertised by sampled HTML.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. This check does not apply to the features observed in this sample.

Recommended fix

An API is optional. Add a service-desc link if you already publish a machine-readable API specification.

Looks good: llms.txt

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

llms.txt exists (26000 chars of markdown).

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: AI crawler access

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The audited URL is allowed for evaluated answer-search crawlers.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: FAQ/QA schema

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

FAQ/QA schema found.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Semantic HTML structure

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Semantic structure present: main×1, article×6, section×8, nav×1, header×1, footer×1.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Answers lead the section

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs get to the point without preamble.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Content is chunkable

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Paragraphs average 22 words, lists present — chunk-friendly.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Cites external sources

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

3 outbound reference(s) across crawled pages.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Consistent brand entity

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Brand declared: og:site_name "Royak" + identity schema.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Description reads as a liftable summary

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Meta description works as a standalone summary.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Entity identity agrees across signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

The site is consistently named "Royak" and 5 identity URL(s) stay on royak.app.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Question headings have concise answers

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

12 concise answer block(s) follow 13 question-shaped heading(s).

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Machine-readable provenance signals

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Found 4 of 4 machine-readable provenance signal types: author, contact, date, breadcrumb.

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: llms.txt follows the spec

Looks good · AI answer readiness · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

llms.txt has an H1, a summary, 9 section(s) and 101 link(s).

Why this matters

This is what an AI assistant relies on when deciding whether it can quote your page. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

AdSense readinessOptional

45/100

Publisher-policy signals, for sites that plan to carry ads. These checks do not affect the overall score or grade, and they do not measure or guarantee AdSense approval.

On its own, this site scores 51/100 for publisher readiness. Ignore this section if you do not run ads.

Could be better: Privacy policy advertising disclosuresFetched privacy policy lacks third-party/vendor disclosure signals.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Published platform ruleCritical

Observed evidence

Fetched privacy policy lacks third-party/vendor disclosure signals.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Describe data collection, sharing, and cookie use by Google and other third-party ad vendors.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://royak.app/privacy
Reference
Could be better: About pageNo about page found.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No about page found.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Add an About page that identifies the publisher, site purpose, and relevant experience. This supports content transparency but is not a standalone AdSense requirement.

Could be better: Tool pages expose explanatory content1/10 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

1/10 tool-style screen(s) expose fewer than 80 publisher words. Google publishes no minimum word count; this is an audit heuristic.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Explain the tool's purpose, inputs, method, limitations, and result interpretation in source HTML. Add useful material, not filler.

Affected pages (1)

  • https://royak.app/sign-up
Reference
Could be better: Author or publisher background2/2 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Could be better · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

2/2 attributed editorial pages provide no discoverable author or publisher background.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. It is there, but weaker than this check expects.

Recommended fix

Link the byline to an author profile or About page, or add truthful structured author details. This is a transparency heuristic, not an AdSense approval rule.

Affected pages (2)

  • https://royak.app/
  • https://royak.app/pricing
Reference
Not measured: ads.txtNo ads.txt yet.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No ads.txt yet.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

When AdSense provides your publisher entry, publish it exactly at /ads.txt and monitor authorization status in your account.

Reference
Not measured: Domain age & historyDomain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

Domain age isn't visible from the site itself.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Do not use age as a content-quality proxy. Verify ownership and account eligibility in AdSense; Google's general eligibility page publishes no domain-age threshold.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article has real depthNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reads the newest one.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article reads as edited workNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then reviews its style signals.

Reference
Not measured: Latest article names an author and a dateNo article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Not measured · AdSense policy · Not established

Observed evidence

No article-shaped page was found on this site, so there is nothing to read.

Why this matters

This observation could not be established from the available evidence. Resolve the collection limit or inspect the relevant source before deciding whether a change is needed.

Recommended fix

Publish articles under a path such as /blog/… and list them in the sitemap. This check then looks for its byline and date.

Reference
Looks good: Privacy policy page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Privacy policy found: https://royak.app/privacy

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Terms page

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Terms page found: /terms

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Contact method

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Contact email found: mailto:support@royak.app

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: First-party contact email

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

First-party contact email found: support@royak.app.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Sampled publisher-content coverage

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

All 8 editorial pages expose at least 250 publisher words; those pages hold 7169 publisher words in total. 2 of the 10 sampled pages are support or tool pages and were excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Thin page share

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

8/8 editorial pages clear the audit's publisher-content triage threshold. 2 of the 10 sampled pages are support or tool pages and were excluded from this check.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: No ads on non-content screens

Looks good · AdSense policy · Published platform rule

Observed evidence

No Google ad code detected on sampled non-content screens.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Reference
Looks good: Publisher content differs across URLs

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

No high publisher-content repetition among 8 substantial sampled page(s).

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Publisher content exists in source HTML

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No empty client-rendered publisher shell in the crawl sample.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Clear navigation

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Navigation present with 42 links.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Article-style content exists

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Article-style content detected.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Show 4 more checks
Looks good: No "coming soon" or placeholder pages

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No "coming soon", "under construction" or lorem-ipsum text on crawled pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Site language is AdSense-supported

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

Language "en" is AdSense-supported.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Existing ad scripts

Looks good · AdSense policy · Measured on your page

Observed evidence

No competing ad scripts on the page.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to do here.

Looks good: Author bylines on content

Looks good · AdSense policy · Review suggested

Observed evidence

Author attribution appears on all 2 sampled editorial pages.

Why this matters

A publisher review looks for this before it accepts a site. The inspected source provides this signal.

Recommended fix

Nothing to change.

Reference

Hosting and infrastructure

Public endpoint facts observed at audit time. A CDN or proxy can conceal the origin infrastructure.

Hosting and infrastructure observations
Hostnameroyak.app
CDN / edgeCloudflare
IP addresses104.21.45.84, 172.67.212.68, 2606:4700:3030::ac43:d444, 2606:4700:3035::6815:2d54
DNS A172.67.212.68 · 104.21.45.84
DNS AAAA2606:4700:3035::6815:2d54 · 2606:4700:3030::ac43:d444
DNS NSmarjory.ns.cloudflare.com · armfazh.ns.cloudflare.com
DNS MX1 aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
TLSTLSv1.3TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Certificate issuerGoogle Trust Services / WE1
Certificate valid untilJan 29 14:50:56 2027 GMT
Certificate validationPassed

Website anatomy and diagnostics

Explore links, resources, crawler access and site integrations.

Page architecture

Choose a page to explore its details and connections.

Page content

1090 publisher words

Page structure

html content

Observed discovery

Depth 0 · 9 incoming links

HTTP 200 · 231.4 KB source

Source interactions

98 controls · 0 unnamed

5 script / 4 stylesheet references

Canonical declaration
https://royak.app/
Schema types
Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, Offer
Outgoing links in sampled graph
/product/ai-employees · /product/office · /product/chat · /product/tasks · /product/knowledge · /product/tables · /product/approvals · /product/budgets · /product/team · /integrations · /security · /pricing · /docs · /solutions/sales · /solutions/sales/ai-sdr · /solutions/sales/lead-generation · /solutions/support · /solutions/support/ai-customer-support-agent · /solutions/marketing · /solutions/marketing/ai-marketing-agent · /solutions/operations · /solutions/operations/ai-executive-assistant · /solutions/engineering · /solutions/people · /docs/what-is-royak · /sign-up · /models/claude · /models/gpt · /models/gemini · /models/grok · /compare/royak-vs-lindy · /compare/royak-vs-sintra · /compare/royak-vs-relevance-ai · /login · /alternatives/lindy · /alternatives/sintra · /alternatives/relevance-ai · /discord · /privacy · /terms

Routes: / · /privacy · /product · /integrations · /security · /pricing · /docs · /solutions · /sign-up · /models

Resource origins 2

Resources associated with your website. External resources may belong to the same organization.

  • https://royak.app/stylesheet, script, image · 217 references · same origin
  • https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/script · 10 references · cross origin
Crawler policy by page

Review crawler access for your pages. Search, training and user-triggered services have different purposes; declared access does not guarantee discovery.

Robots policy for every evaluated crawler and sampled page
Crawler / purposePagePolicyMatched directive
Googlebotsearch/allowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/integrationsallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/securityallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/docsallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/sign-upallowedallow: /
Googlebotsearch/models/claudeallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/allowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/integrationsallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/securityallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/docsallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/sign-upallowedallow: /
bingbotsearch/models/claudeallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/integrationsallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/securityallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/docsallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/sign-upallowedallow: /
OAI-SearchBotsearch/models/claudeallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/allowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/integrationsallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/securityallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/docsallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/sign-upallowedallow: /
PerplexityBotsearch/models/claudeallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/allowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/privacyallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/integrationsallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/securityallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/pricingallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/docsallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/sign-upallowedallow: /
Claude-SearchBotsearch/models/claudeallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/allowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/privacyallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/integrationsallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/securityallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/pricingallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/docsallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/sign-upallowedallow: /
GPTBottraining/models/claudeallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/allowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/privacyallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/integrationsallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/securityallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/pricingallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/docsallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/sign-upallowedallow: /
ClaudeBottraining/models/claudeallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/allowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/privacyallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/integrationsallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/securityallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/pricingallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/docsallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/sign-upallowedallow: /
Google-Extendedtraining and other Google AI uses/models/claudeallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/allowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/privacyallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/product/ai-employeesallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/integrationsallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/securityallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/pricingallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/docsallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/solutions/salesallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/sign-upallowedallow: /
ChatGPT-Useruser-initiated; robots may not apply/models/claudeallowedallow: /
Advertised APIs and machine interfaces
  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/what-is-royak

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/people-light.webp

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/people-dark.webp

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/departments-and-employees

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/hire-your-first-employee

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/skills

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/connecting-apps

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/approvals

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/how-credits-work

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/your-own-ai-key

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/pause-the-company

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/create-your-company

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/give-your-first-task

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/your-first-approval

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/the-3d-office

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/guide-support-team

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/guide-plan-a-campaign

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/guide-weekly-routine

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/guide-work-a-lead-list

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/needs-you-and-inbox

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/chat

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/goals-and-work

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/task-record

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/teams-and-handoffs

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/artifacts

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/routines

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/intakes

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/import-automations

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

  • documentation · declared

    https://royak.app/docs/tables

    This interface was advertised; its runtime behavior remains unverified.

Public DNS and TLS endpoint

royak.app · observed · 104.21.45.84, 172.67.212.68, 2606:4700:3030::ac43:d444, 2606:4700:3035::6815:2d54

A
172.67.212.68 · 104.21.45.84
AAAA
2606:4700:3035::6815:2d54 · 2606:4700:3030::ac43:d444
CNAME
Unavailable for this exact hostname
NS
marjory.ns.cloudflare.com · armfazh.ns.cloudflare.com
MX
1 aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com · 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com · 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
CAA
Unavailable for this exact hostname

TLS: TLSv1.3

Certificate validation passed for the observed endpoint.

Issuer: Google Trust Services / WE1

Certificate valid until: Jan 29 14:50:56 2027 GMT

PageSpeed measurement

Loading the PageSpeed panel…

Growth resources

Loading growth resources…

Where to take this site next

Follow-on work suggested by the observations above.

  1. 01

    Build content depth around real keywords

    Technical basics are in place — use pages that answer actual searches as the next content focus. This audit does not measure rankings.

  2. 02

    Steal from our keyword datasets

    Curated keyword collections by niche give you a content calendar without paid tools.

Apply the recommended fixes

Hand the complete evidence to a coding agent, or take the report with you.

Open in ChatGPT Open in Grok Open in Perplexity

Report notes

  • 01This report covers the sampled public pages listed above. Other pages may have different results.
  • 02Browser-rendered content, private backend systems and authenticated experiences may require a separate review.
  • 03Unavailable observations are identified in the report. Results do not guarantee rankings, citations, security, accessibility or advertising approval.
Pages included in this report
  • https://royak.app/
  • https://royak.app/privacy
  • https://royak.app/product/ai-employees
  • https://royak.app/integrations
  • https://royak.app/security
  • https://royak.app/pricing
  • https://royak.app/docs
  • https://royak.app/solutions/sales
  • https://royak.app/sign-up
  • https://royak.app/models/claude